» Articles » PMID: 36415691

Microsurgical Technique for Reconstruction of Hemi-uterus with Non-communicating Rudimentary Uterine Horns

Overview
Date 2022 Nov 23
PMID 36415691
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Case Description: Three cases of patients diagnosed with Hemi-uterus with non-communicating functional rudimentary cavity are reported.

Clinical Findings: Adolescent patients with the presence of disabling pelvic pain during menstrual periods, in addition to depressive states and functional disability secondary to pain.

Treatment And Outcome: Reconstruction of Hemi-uterus with non-communicating functional rudimentary cavity using a microsurgical technique, without the need for non-communicating horn resection. The patients were assessed at the 1st, third, and sixth months, showing a marked improvement in their dysmenorrhea. In addition, there was an improvement in the depressive state; there was no change in the volume of her menstrual bleeding, and one of these patients achieved pregnancy with normal prenatal control and cesarean delivery, obtaining a full-term newborn without complications.

Clinical Relevance: Description of a novel microsurgical technique for the management of the hemi-uterus with a non-communicating functional rudimentary cavity, which could benefit not only the reduction of associated symptoms but could also become an alternative to improve fertility in these patients.

References
1.
Main C . Pain assessment in context: a state of the science review of the McGill pain questionnaire 40 years on. Pain. 2015; 157(7):1387-1399. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000457. View

2.
Grimbizis G, Campo R . Congenital malformations of the female genital tract: the need for a new classification system. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(2):401-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.030. View

3.
. Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril. 1997; 67(5):817-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81391-x. View

4.
Chan Y, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton J, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A . The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17(6):761-71. PMC: 3191936. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr028. View

5.
Letterie G . Management of congenital uterine abnormalities. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011; 23(1):40-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.02.008. View