» Articles » PMID: 36414225

Does Gabapentin Provide Benefit for Patients with Knee OA? A Benefit-harm and Cost-effectiveness Analysis

Overview
Date 2022 Nov 22
PMID 36414225
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Gabapentin can treat neuropathic pain syndromes and has increasingly been prescribed to treat nociplastic pain. Some patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) suffer from both nociceptive and nociplastic pain. We examined the cost-effectiveness of adding gabapentin to knee OA care.

Method: We used the Osteoarthritis Policy Model, a validated Monte Carlo simulation of knee OA, to examine the value of gabapentin in treating knee OA by comparing three strategies: 1) usual care, gabapentin sparing (UC-GS); 2) targeted gabapentin (TG), which provides gabapentin plus usual care for those who screen positive for nociplastic pain on the modified PainDETECT questionnaire (mPD-Q) and usual care only for those who screen negative; and 3) universal gabapentin plus usual care (UG). Outcomes included cumulative quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime direct medical costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), discounted at 3% annually. We derived model inputs from published literature and national databases and varied key input parameters in sensitivity analyses.

Results: UC-GS dominated both gabapentin-containing strategies, as it led to lower costs and more QALYs. TG resulted in a cost increase of $689 and a cumulative QALY reduction of 0.012 QALYs. UG resulted in a further $1,868 cost increase and 0.036 QALY decrease. The results were robust to plausible changes in input parameters. The lowest TG strategy ICER of $53,000/QALY was reported when mPD-Q specificity was increased to 100% and AE rate was reduced to 0%.

Conclusion: Incorporating gabapentin into care for patients with knee OA does not appear to offer good value.

Citing Articles

Preoperative Synovial Tissue and Synovial Fluid Biomarkers as Predictors for Outcomes After Knee Arthroscopy and ACL Reconstruction: A Narrative Review.

Gottreich J, Katz J, Jones M Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(3):23259671231193370.

PMID: 38496336 PMC: 10943742. DOI: 10.1177/23259671231193370.


Assessment of Pain in Osteoarthritis of the Knee.

Thirumaran A, Deveza L, Atukorala I, Hunter D J Pers Med. 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37511752 PMC: 10381750. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071139.

References
1.
Neumann P, Cohen J, Weinstein M . Updating cost-effectiveness--the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(9):796-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1405158. View

2.
Hochman J, Gagliese L, Davis A, Hawker G . Neuropathic pain symptoms in a community knee OA cohort. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011; 19(6):647-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.03.007. View

3.
Kolasinski S, Neogi T, Hochberg M, Oatis C, Guyatt G, Block J . 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hand, Hip, and Knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020; 72(2):149-162. PMC: 11488261. DOI: 10.1002/acr.24131. View

4.
Bellows B, Nelson R, Oderda G, LaFleur J . Long-term cost-effectiveness of initiating treatment for painful diabetic neuropathy with pregabalin, duloxetine, gabapentin, or desipramine. Pain. 2015; 157(1):203-213. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000350. View

5.
Tarride J, Gordon A, Vera-Llonch M, Dukes E, Rousseau C . Cost-effectiveness of pregabalin for the management of neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia: a Canadian perspective. Clin Ther. 2007; 28(11):1922-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.11.017. View