» Articles » PMID: 36411768

Long-term Results of Mycophenolate Mofetil . Azathioprine Use in Individuals with Autoimmune Hepatitis

Overview
Journal JHEP Rep
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2022 Nov 22
PMID 36411768
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background & Aims: We have shown previously that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) might be used as first-line treatment instead of azathioprine (AZA) in individuals with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Herein, we present our long-term prospective data on response and outcome after first-line therapy with MMF in treatment-naïve individuals with AIH, as similar data are missing.

Methods: During the 21 years of the study, 292 individuals with AIH were included (females: 213; median age: 59 [17-85] years). Patients received either prednisolone 0.5-1 mg/kg/day alone (n = 19) or in combination with AZA 1-2 mg/kg/day (n = 64) or MMF (n = 183). The tapering schedule of prednisolone was identical between groups. We assessed the rates of complete biochemical response (CBR) at 6 months, 12 months, and the end of follow-up; non-response (4 weeks of treatment); CBR off prednisolone; adverse effects; CBR off treatment; histological remission; and overall and liver-related mortality between the AZA and MMF groups.

Results: The MMF group had lower non-response ( = 0.02) and higher CBR rates at 12 months (86 . 71.8%; <0.05) and the end of follow-up (96 . 87.2%;  = 0.03) than the AZA group. Treatment change was more frequent in the AZA group (43.7 . 11%; <0.001), mostly because of intolerance, whereas MMF was proven safe (serious complications 3.8 . 18.8%;  = 0.0003). MMF-treated patients were more frequently eligible to stop immunosuppression according to the guidelines ( <0.05). Cirrhosis at diagnosis, age at diagnosis >60 years, and longer disease duration were independent predictors of liver-related mortality.

Conclusions: MMF seems an efficient alternative first-line treatment option for AIH, bearing lower non-response at 4 weeks and higher CBR rates at 12 months and the end of follow-up than AZA. In addition, MMF was proven to be safe, leading more frequently to the eligibility for stopping immunosuppression according to the guidelines.

Impact And Implications: For more than 40 years, azathioprine (AZA) has been considered the standard treatment for induction and maintenance of response in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). However, treatment usually needs to be maintained for life, as relapses are common after AZA cessation. Therefore, alternative treatment options are needed. Herein, we showed that the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as an alternative first-line immunosuppressant was much more efficient in the long-term than AZA as attested by the lower non-response rates at 4 weeks and higher response rates at 12 months and the end of follow-up. Moreover, AZA-treated patients were more prone to change treatment because of intolerance, whereas MMF-treated patients were more often eligible to achieve treatment withdrawal.

Citing Articles

Autoimmune hepatitis under the COVID-19 veil: an analysis of the nature of potential associations.

Yu C, Wang W, Zhang Q, Jin Z Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1510770.

PMID: 39958350 PMC: 11825795. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1510770.


autoimmune hepatitis? - Summary of the 5 international autoimmune hepatitis group research workshop 2024.

Engel B, Assis D, Bhat M, Clusmann J, Drenth J, Gerussi A JHEP Rep. 2025; 7(2):101265.

PMID: 39897612 PMC: 11783120. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101265.


Current Treatment Regimens and Promising Molecular Therapies for Chronic Hepatobiliary Diseases.

Durazzo M, Ferro A, Navarro-Tableros V, Gaido A, Fornengo P, Altruda F Biomolecules. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39858515 PMC: 11763965. DOI: 10.3390/biom15010121.


Autoimmune hepatitis: Towards a personalized treatment.

Costaguta A, Costaguta G, Alvarez F World J Hepatol. 2024; 16(11):1225-1242.

PMID: 39606175 PMC: 11586748. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i11.1225.


Hellenic Association for the Study of the Liver (HASL): revised clinical practice guidelines for autoimmune hepatitis.

Dalekos G, Papatheodoridis G, Koskinas J, Goulis I, Rigopoulou E, Tiniakos D Ann Gastroenterol. 2024; 37(6):623-654.

PMID: 39568707 PMC: 11574148. DOI: 10.20524/aog.2024.0924.


References
1.
Cook G, Mulligan R, Sherlock S . Controlled prospective trial of corticosteroid therapy in active chronic hepatitis. Q J Med. 1971; 40(158):159-85. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.qjmed.a067264. View

2.
Johnson P, McFarlane I, Williams R . Azathioprine for long-term maintenance of remission in autoimmune hepatitis. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333(15):958-63. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199510123331502. View

3.
Summerskill W, Korman M, Ammon H, BAGGENSTOSS A . Prednisone for chronic active liver disease: dose titration, standard dose, and combination with azathioprine compared. Gut. 1975; 16(11):876-83. PMC: 1413126. DOI: 10.1136/gut.16.11.876. View

4.
Kirk A, Jain S, Pocock S, Thomas H, Sherlock S . Late results of the Royal Free Hospital prospective controlled trial of prednisolone therapy in hepatitis B surface antigen negative chronic active hepatitis. Gut. 1980; 21(1):78-83. PMC: 1419564. DOI: 10.1136/gut.21.1.78. View

5.
Iaccarino L, Rampudda M, Canova M, Della Libera S, Sarzi-Puttinic P, Doria A . Mycophenolate mofetil: what is its place in the treatment of autoimmune rheumatic diseases?. Autoimmun Rev. 2007; 6(3):190-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2006.11.001. View