» Articles » PMID: 36408890

PH-Responsive Nanofiber Buttresses As Local Drug Delivery Devices

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electrospun nanofibers are a 3D scaffold of choice for many drug delivery devices due to their high surface area, significant capacity for drug payload, ease of placement, and scalable manufacture. Herein, we report the synthesis of polymeric, pH-responsive nanofiber buttresses electrospinning. The homopolymer is comprised of an acrylic backbone with acid-sensitive, hydrolyzable, trimethoxybenzaldehyde-protected side chains that lead to buttress transformation from a hydrophobic to a hydrophilic state under physiologically relevant pH conditions (, extracellular tumor environment with pH = 6.5). Hydrolysis of the side chains leads to an increase in fiber diameter from approximately 350 to 900 nm and the release of the encapsulated drug cargo. drug release profiles demonstrate that significantly more drug is released at pH 5.5 compared to pH 7.4, thereby limiting the release to the target site, with docetaxel releasing over 20 days and doxorubicin over 7 days. Drug burst release, defined as >50% within 24 hours, does not occur at either pH or with either drug. Drug-loaded buttresses preserve drug activity and are cytotoxic to multiple human cancer lines, including breast and lung. Important to their potential application in surgical applications, the tensile strength of the buttresses is 6.3 kPa and, though weaker than commercially available buttresses, they provide sufficient flexibility and mechanical integrity to serve as buttressing materials the application with a conventional surgical cutting stapler.

Citing Articles

Advancements in wound management: integrating nanotechnology and smart materials for enhanced therapeutic interventions.

Nasra S, Pramanik S, Oza V, Kansara K, Kumar A Discov Nano. 2024; 19(1):159.

PMID: 39354172 PMC: 11445205. DOI: 10.1186/s11671-024-04116-3.


Advanced applications of smart electrospun nanofibers in cancer therapy: With insight into material capabilities and electrospinning parameters.

Tayebi-Khorrami V, Rahmanian-Devin P, Fadaei M, Movaffagh J, Askari V Int J Pharm X. 2024; 8:100265.

PMID: 39045009 PMC: 11263755. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2024.100265.


Application of Electrospun Drug-Loaded Nanofibers in Cancer Therapy.

Yang Y, Zhang R, Liang Z, Guo J, Chen B, Zhou S Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(4).

PMID: 38399882 PMC: 10892891. DOI: 10.3390/polym16040504.


-Sulfonyl amidine polypeptides: new polymeric biomaterials with conformation transition responsive to tumor acidity.

Xu X, Ma J, Wang A, Zheng N Chem Sci. 2024; 15(5):1769-1781.

PMID: 38303932 PMC: 10829015. DOI: 10.1039/d3sc05504c.


Nanofiber Scaffolds as Drug Delivery Systems Promoting Wound Healing.

Jiang Z, Zheng Z, Yu S, Gao Y, Ma J, Huang L Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(7).

PMID: 37514015 PMC: 10384736. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071829.


References
1.
Herrera V, Colby A, Tan G, Moran A, OBrien M, Colson Y . Evaluation of expansile nanoparticle tumor localization and efficacy in a cancer stem cell-derived model of pancreatic peritoneal carcinomatosis. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2016; 11(9):1001-15. PMC: 4910944. DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2015-0023. View

2.
Thevenot J, Oliveira H, Sandre O, Lecommandoux S . Magnetic responsive polymer composite materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2013; 42(17):7099-116. DOI: 10.1039/c3cs60058k. View

3.
Singh B, Shukla N, Kim J, Kim K, Park M . Stimuli-Responsive Nanofibers Containing Gold Nanorods for On-Demand Drug Delivery Platforms. Pharmaceutics. 2021; 13(8). PMC: 8400774. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081319. View

4.
Qi Y, Min H, Mujeeb A, Zhang Y, Han X, Zhao X . Injectable Hexapeptide Hydrogel for Localized Chemotherapy Prevents Breast Cancer Recurrence. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018; 10(8):6972-6981. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b19258. View

5.
Griset A, Walpole J, Liu R, Gaffey A, Colson Y, Grinstaff M . Expansile nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and in vivo efficacy of an acid-responsive polymeric drug delivery system. J Am Chem Soc. 2009; 131(7):2469-71. DOI: 10.1021/ja807416t. View