» Articles » PMID: 36408020

Ultra-widefield Color Fundus Photography Combined with High-speed Ultra-widefield Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for Non-invasive Detection of Lesions in Diabetic Retinopathy

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Nov 21
PMID 36408020
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the detection rate of diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions and the agreement of DR severity grading using the ultra-widefield color fundus photography (UWF CFP) combined with high-speed ultra-widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (UWF SS-OCTA) or fluorescein angiography (FFA).

Methods: This prospective, observational study recruited diabetic patients who had already taken the FFA examination from November 2021 to June 2022. These patients had either no DR or any stage of DR. All participants were imaged with a 200° UWF CFP and UWF SS-OCTA using a 24 × 20 mm scan model. Images were independently evaluated for the presence or absence of DR lesions including microaneurysms (MAs), intraretinal hemorrhage (IRH), non-perfusion areas (NPAs), intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMAs), venous beading (VB), neovascularization elsewhere (NVE), neovascularization of the optic disc (NVD), and vitreous or preretinal hemorrhage (VH/PRH). Agreement of DR severity grading based on UWF CFP plus UWF SS-OCTA and UWF CFP plus FFA was compared. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS V.26.0.

Results: One hundred and fifty-three eyes of 86 participants were enrolled in the study. The combination of UWF CFP with UWF SS-OCTA showed a similar detection rate compared with UWF CFP plus FFA for all the characteristic DR lesions (>0.05), except NPAs ( = 0.039). Good agreement was shown for the identification of VB (κ = 0.635), and very good agreement for rest of the DR lesions between the two combination methods (κ-value ranged from 0.858 to 0.974). When comparing the grading of DR severity, very good agreement was achieved between UWF CFP plus UWF SS-OCTA and UWF CFP plusr FFA (κ = 0.869).

Conclusion: UWF CFP plus UWF SS-OCTA had a very good agreement in detecting DR lesions and determining the severity of DR compared with UWF CFP plus FFA. This modality has the potential to be used as a fast, reliable, and non-invasive method for DR screening and monitoring in the future.

Citing Articles

Silicone oil emulsification: A literature review and role of widefield imaging and ultra-widefield imaging with navigated central and peripheral optical coherence tomography technology.

Valentin-Bravo F, Stanga P, Reinstein U, Stanga S, Martinez-Tapia S, Pastor-Idoate S Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2024; 38(2):112-122.

PMID: 38988778 PMC: 11232747. DOI: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_193_23.


The clinical evaluation of a widefield lens to expand the field of view in optical coherence tomography (OCT-A).

Soecknick F, Breher K, Nafar Z, Kubach S, Straub J, Wahl S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):6936.

PMID: 38521801 PMC: 10960788. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57405-3.


Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography as a Diagnostic Tool for Diabetic Retinopathy.

Wijesingha N, Tsai W, Merve Keskin A, Holmes C, Kazantzis D, Chandak S Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38337841 PMC: 10855126. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14030326.


A Complete Review of Automatic Detection, Segmentation, and Quantification of Neovascularization in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Images.

Tun Y, Aimmanee P Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(22).

PMID: 37998544 PMC: 10670378. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13223407.


Hybrid Fusion of High-Resolution and Ultra-Widefield OCTA Acquisitions for the Automatic Diagnosis of Diabetic Retinopathy.

Li Y, El Habib Daho M, Conze P, Zeghlache R, Le Boite H, Bonnin S Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(17).

PMID: 37685306 PMC: 10486731. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13172770.


References
1.
Russell J, Shi Y, Hinkle J, Scott N, Fan K, Lyu C . Longitudinal Wide-Field Swept-Source OCT Angiography of Neovascularization in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy after Panretinal Photocoagulation. Ophthalmol Retina. 2019; 3(4):350-361. PMC: 6482856. DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2018.11.008. View

2.
Wilkinson C, Ferris 3rd F, Klein R, Lee P, Agardh C, Davis M . Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110(9):1677-82. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00475-5. View

3.
Zhu Y, Cui Y, Wang J, Lu Y, Zeng R, Katz R . Different Scan Protocols Affect the Detection Rates of Diabetic Retinopathy Lesions by Wide-Field Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020; 215:72-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.03.004. View

4.
Sivaprasad S, Gupta B, Crosby-Nwaobi R, Evans J . Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in various ethnic groups: a worldwide perspective. Surv Ophthalmol. 2012; 57(4):347-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.01.004. View

5.
Silva P, Cavallerano J, Sun J, Soliman A, Aiello L, Aiello L . Peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultrawide field imaging: distribution and potential impact on diabetic retinopathy severity. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(12):2587-2595. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.05.004. View