» Articles » PMID: 36408004

Putting Prospection into Practice: Methodological Considerations in the Use of Episodic Future Thinking to Reduce Delay Discounting and Maladaptive Health Behaviors

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Nov 21
PMID 36408004
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, episodic future thinking (EFT) has emerged as a promising behavioral intervention to reduce delay discounting or maladaptive health behaviors; however, considerable methodological heterogeneity in methods for eliciting engagement in EFT has been observed in prior research. In this narrative review, we briefly describe methods for generating EFT cues, the content of EFT cues, common control conditions for experiments utilizing EFT, and considerations for cue delivery and implementation. Where possible, we make suggestions for current best practices in each category while identifying gaps in knowledge and potential areas of future research. Finally, we conclude by using the NIH Stage model to better frame the current state of the literature on EFT and propose gaps to be addressed if EFT is to be both an efficacious and effective behavioral intervention.

Citing Articles

Reinforcement Learning Interventions on Boundedly Rational Human Agents in Frictionful Tasks.

Nofshin E, Swaroop S, Pan W, Murphy S, Doshi-Velez F Proc Int Joint Conf Auton Agents Multiagent Syst. 2024; 2024:1482-1491.

PMID: 39381596 PMC: 11460771.


Recent Experience Affects Delay Discounting: Evidence across Temporal Framing, Signs, and Magnitudes.

Willis-Moore M, Haynes J, Frye C, Johnson H, Cousins D, Bamfo H Perspect Behav Sci. 2024; 47(2):365-392.

PMID: 39099743 PMC: 11294302. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-024-00412-6.


Examining the association between delay discounting, delay aversion and physical activity in Chinese adults with type-2 diabetes mellitus.

An Y, Ma G, Cai X, Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang Z World J Diabetes. 2024; 15(4):675-685.

PMID: 38680691 PMC: 11045427. DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i4.675.


Acceptability and feasibility of a mobile behavioral economic health intervention to reduce alcohol use in adults in rural areas.

Bayrakdarian N, Bonar E, Duguid I, Hellman L, Salino S, Wilkins C Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2024; 11:100225.

PMID: 38545408 PMC: 10966148. DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100225.


Episodic future thinking in type 2 diabetes: Further development and validation of the Health Information Thinking control for clinical trials.

Brown J, Bickel W, Epstein L, Stein J PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0289478.

PMID: 37535609 PMC: 10399790. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289478.

References
1.
Epstein L, Paluch R, Biondolillo M, Stein J, Quattrin T, Mastrandrea L . Effects of 6-month episodic future thinking training on delay discounting, weight loss and HbA1c changes in individuals with prediabetes. J Behav Med. 2022; 45(2):227-239. PMC: 8744570. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-021-00278-y. View

2.
Nichols A, Maner J . The good-subject effect: investigating participant demand characteristics. J Gen Psychol. 2008; 135(2):151-65. DOI: 10.3200/GENP.135.2.151-166. View

3.
Epstein L, Jimenez-Knight T, Honan A, Biondolillo M, Paluch R, Bickel W . A story to tell: the role of narratives in reducing delay discounting for people who strongly discount the future. Memory. 2021; 29(6):708-718. PMC: 8461562. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1936560. View

4.
Bickel W, George Wilson A, Chen C, Koffarnus M, Franck C . Stuck in Time: Negative Income Shock Constricts the Temporal Window of Valuation Spanning the Future and the Past. PLoS One. 2016; 11(9):e0163051. PMC: 5025165. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163051. View

5.
DeHart W, Snider S, Pope D, Bickel W . A reinforcer pathology model of health behaviors in individuals with obesity. Health Psychol. 2020; 39(11):966-974. PMC: 9520608. DOI: 10.1037/hea0000995. View