Evolutionary History and Patterns of Geographical Variation, Fertility, and Hybridization in (Potamogetonaceae)

Overview

Journal Front Plant Sci

Date 2022 Nov 21

PMID 36407593

Authors

Judith Fehrer

Michaela Nagy Nejedla

C Barre Hellquist

Alexander A Bobrov

Zdenek Kaplan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aquatic plant species are often widespread, even across continents. They pose a challenge to species delimitation and taxonomy due to their reduced morphology and high phenotypic plasticity. These difficulties are even more pronounced in the case of interspecific hybridization. We investigate the aquatic plant genus for the first time on a worldwide scale. Expert species determination is aided by sequencing of nuclear ribosomal and regions and the plastid intergenic spacers and . Nuclear markers are used to infer hybridization, and the maternal origin of hybrids is addressed with plastid markers. Pure species are subjected to phylogenetic analyses. Two main lineages are found: one consists of , , , and , the other includes and The widespread species , , and show intraspecific genetic variation, which is structured geographically. Many intraspecific hybrids, which are usually fertile, occur between those genotypes. Interspecific hybrids, which are consistently sterile, are detected among all widespread species; some are reported for the first time in several countries and regions. They originated multiple times from reciprocal crosses and reflect the geographical origins of parental genotypes. Intraspecific genetic variation can be higher than interspecific differences between closely related species. Comparison of phenotypic variation in the field and in cultivation with genotypic variation shows that numerous conspicuous forms have been overestimated taxonomically. These are resolved as phenotypes responding to unusual environments, have recurrently evolved adaptations, or represent extreme forms of continuous variation of the recognized species. However, some specific regional lineages, which have evolved from variable species, may be interpreted as early steps of the speciation process. Hybridization has been underestimated in some regions as a source of diversity, and the respective hybrid plants have been misidentified as intraspecific taxa or even as separate species. Many erroneous entries in sequence databases are detected and summarized. This work provides a sound basis for species delimitation and hybrid recognition in this difficult genus.

References

Whittemore A, Schaal B . Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88(6):2540-4. PMC: 51268. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.6.2540. View

Huson D, Bryant D . Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 2005; 23(2):254-67. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj030. View

Du Z, Wang Q . Allopatric divergence of Stuckenia filiformis (Potamogetonaceae) on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and its comparative phylogeography with S. pectinata in China. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:20883. PMC: 4750007. DOI: 10.1038/srep20883. View

Kuzmina M, Braukmann T, Fazekas A, Graham S, deWaard S, Rodrigues A . Using herbarium-derived DNAs to assemble a large-scale DNA barcode library for the vascular plants of Canada. Appl Plant Sci. 2018; 5(12). PMC: 5749818. DOI: 10.3732/apps.1700079. View

Zhao T, Wang G, Ma Q, Liang L, Yang Z . Multilocus data reveal deep phylogenetic relationships and intercontinental biogeography of the Eurasian-North American genus Corylus (Betulaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2019; 142:106658. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106658. View

Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres D, Darling A, Hohna S . MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012; 61(3):539-42. PMC: 3329765. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. View

Posada D, Crandall K . MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 1999; 14(9):817-8. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817. View

Acosta M, Premoli A . Evidence of chloroplast capture in South American Nothofagus (subgenus Nothofagus, Nothofagaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009; 54(1):235-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.08.008. View

Simmons M, Ochoterena H . Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst Biol. 2002; 49(2):369-81. View

10.

Lindqvist C, De Laet J, Haynes R, Aagesen L, Keener B, Albert V . Molecular phylogenetics of an aquatic plant lineage, Potamogetonaceae. Cladistics. 2021; 22(6):568-588. DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00124.x. View

11.

Kaplan Z, Fehrer J . Molecular evidence for a natural primary triple hybrid in plants revealed from direct sequencing. Ann Bot. 2007; 99(6):1213-22. PMC: 3243585. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcm072. View

12.

Kaplan Z, Fehrer J, Bambasova V, Hellquist C . The endangered Florida pondweed (Potamogeton floridanus) is a hybrid: Why we need to understand biodiversity thoroughly. PLoS One. 2018; 13(4):e0195241. PMC: 5880373. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195241. View

13.

Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K . MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018; 35(6):1547-1549. PMC: 5967553. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. View

14.

Alvarez I, Wendel J . Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003; 29(3):417-34. DOI: 10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00208-2. View

15.

Kuzmina M, Braukmann T, Zakharov E . Finding the pond through the weeds: eDNA reveals underestimated diversity of pondweeds. Appl Plant Sci. 2018; 6(5):e01155. PMC: 5991581. DOI: 10.1002/aps3.1155. View

16.

Fehrer J, Krak K, Chrtek Jr J . Intra-individual polymorphism in diploid and apomictic polyploid hawkweeds (Hieracium, Lactuceae, Asteraceae): disentangling phylogenetic signal, reticulation, and noise. BMC Evol Biol. 2009; 9:239. PMC: 2759941. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-239. View