» Articles » PMID: 36406296

Direct Observation Methods: a Practical Guide for Health Researchers

Overview
Journal PEC Innov
Specialty Health Services
Date 2022 Nov 21
PMID 36406296
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To provide health research teams with a practical, methodologically rigorous guide on how to conduct direct observation.

Methods: Synthesis of authors' observation-based teaching and research experiences in social sciences and health services research.

Results: This article serves as a guide for making key decisions in studies involving direct observation. Study development begins with determining if observation methods are warranted or feasible. Deciding what and how to observe entails reviewing literature and defining what abstract, theoretically informed concepts look like in practice. Data collection tools help systematically record phenomena of interest. Interdisciplinary teams--that include relevant community members-- increase relevance, rigor and reliability, distribute work, and facilitate scheduling. Piloting systematizes data collection across the team and proactively addresses issues.

Conclusion: Observation can elucidate phenomena germane to healthcare research questions by adding unique insights. Careful selection and sampling are critical to rigor. Phenomena like taboo behaviors or rare events are difficult to capture. A thoughtful protocol can preempt Institutional Review Board concerns.

Innovation: This novel guide provides a practical adaptation of traditional approaches to observation to meet contemporary healthcare research teams' needs.

Citing Articles

Characterizing Emergency Department Disposition Conversations for Persons Living With Dementia: Protocol for an Ethnographic Study.

Seidenfeld J, Tucker M, Harris-Gersten M, Fix G, Guzman I, Sperber N JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e65043.

PMID: 39642361 PMC: 11662188. DOI: 10.2196/65043.


Using Artificial Intelligence-informed Experience-Based Co-Design (AI-EBCD) to create a virtual reality-based mindfulness application to reduce diabetes distress: protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility study.

Ghosal S, Stanmore E, Sturt J, Bogosian A, Woodcock D, Zhang M BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e088576.

PMID: 39613448 PMC: 11605828. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088576.


Co-designing a blueprint for spreading person-centered, Whole Health care to HIV specialty care settings: a mixed methods protocol.

Rupcic S, Tam M, DeLaughter K, Gifford A, Barker A, Bokhour B BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1306.

PMID: 39472856 PMC: 11520821. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11733-2.


Factors Guiding Clinical Decision-Making in Genitourinary Oncology.

Wosny M, Aeppli S, Fischer S, Peres T, Rothermundt C, Hastings J Cancer Med. 2024; 13(20):e70304.

PMID: 39435678 PMC: 11494402. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70304.


Balancing the uncertain and unpredictable nature of possible zoonotic disease transmission with the value placed on animals: Findings from a qualitative study in Guinea.

Gurman T, Diallo K, Larson E, Sugg K, Tibbels N PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(3):e0001174.

PMID: 38547137 PMC: 10977678. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001174.


References
1.
Roter D, Larson S . The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns. 2002; 46(4):243-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00012-5. View

2.
Evans C, Lambert H . Implementing community interventions for HIV prevention: insights from project ethnography. Soc Sci Med. 2007; 66(2):467-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.030. View

3.
Street Jr R, Makoul G, Arora N, Epstein R . How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 74(3):295-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015. View

4.
Kuhn H, Park A, Kim B, Lukesh W, Rose A . Proportion of work appropriate for pharmacy technicians in anticoagulation clinics. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016; 73(5):322-7. DOI: 10.2146/ajhp150272. View

5.
McCarron T, Moffat K, Wilkinson G, Zelinsky S, Boyd J, White D . Understanding patient engagement in health system decision-making: a co-designed scoping review. Syst Rev. 2019; 8(1):97. PMC: 6474065. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-0994-8. View