» Articles » PMID: 36406088

Technologies Monitoring and Improving Biosecurity Compliance in Barn Anterooms

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2022 Nov 21
PMID 36406088
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

People can act as mechanical vectors, and introduce and spread infectious diseases on farms. Preventive measures, such as changing boots and washing hands, need systematic implementation to manage this risk. Unfortunately, biosecurity compliance regarding biosecurity measures in barn anterooms has been shown to be generally low in all animal production systems. Indeed, the main challenge with biosecurity is maintaining compliance. The development of an effective on-farm biosecurity program requires several elements. These include farm and barn designs facilitating implementation of biosecurity measures; consistently communicating with all personnel and visitors informing them about threats and biosecurity; training programs for all farm personnel, explaining why biosecurity is effective in preventing infectious disease transmission, which measures are needed, and how to best implement them. All these components would be further optimized if automated monitoring systems were implemented with feedback mechanisms. Technologies are now available and are being adapted to the farm context to monitor biosecurity compliance. Two pilot projects using radio-frequency-identification-based (RFID) real-time continuous automated monitoring system quantifying hand sanitizing and boot compliance were conducted. The first one ( system) was a system designed to monitor and provide real-time feedback for handwashing in a hospital environment. It was functional for this task, although not sturdy enough for long-term use in a farm environment. The second system was a prototype designed for barns and with foot mats allowing the monitoring of footwear management as well as handwashing. These pilot studies have shown that real-time feedback helps improve compliance. However, the efficacy of the systems was very dependent on the physical set-up of the anteroom.

Citing Articles

How Do Flemish Laying Hen Farmers and Private Bird Keepers Comply with and Think about Measures to Control Avian Influenza?.

Delanglez F, Ampe B, Watteyn A, Van Damme L, Tuyttens F Vet Sci. 2024; 11(10).

PMID: 39453067 PMC: 11512282. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11100475.


Quantitative Risk Assessment of Wind-Supported Transmission of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus to Dutch Poultry Farms via Fecal Particles from Infected Wild Birds in the Environment.

de Vos C, Elbers A Pathogens. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 39057798 PMC: 11279698. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13070571.


Supporting Measures to Improve Biosecurity within Italian Poultry Production.

Tilli G, Laconi A, Galuppo F, Grilli G, Zbikowski A, Amalraj A Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 38929353 PMC: 11201041. DOI: 10.3390/ani14121734.


Stakeholders' Perceptions of Biosecurity Implementation in Italian Poultry Farms.

Laconi A, Tilli G, Galuppo F, Grilli G, Souillard R, Piccirillo A Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(20).

PMID: 37893970 PMC: 10603624. DOI: 10.3390/ani13203246.


Connecting livestock disease dynamics to human learning and biosecurity decisions.

Bucini G, Clark E, Merrill S, Langle-Chimal O, Zia A, Koliba C Front Vet Sci. 2023; 9:1067364.

PMID: 36744225 PMC: 9896627. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1067364.

References
1.
Amass S, Pacheco J, Mason P, Schneider J, Alvarez R, Clark L . Procedures for preventing the transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus to pigs and sheep by personnel in contact with infected pigs. Vet Rec. 2003; 153(5):137-40. DOI: 10.1136/vr.153.5.137. View

2.
Conrad P . The meaning of medications: another look at compliance. Soc Sci Med. 1985; 20(1):29-37. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90308-9. View

3.
Tibballs J . Teaching hospital medical staff to handwash. Med J Aust. 1996; 164(7):395-8. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb124899.x. View

4.
Belage E, Dufour S, Shock D, Jones-Bitton A, Kelton D . Adoption and consistency of application of premilking preparation in Ontario dairy herds. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100(5):3902-3911. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11698. View

5.
Hald B, Wedderkopp A, Madsen M . Thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in Danish broiler production: a cross-sectional survey and a retrospective analysis of risk factors for occurrence in broiler flocks. Avian Pathol. 2009; 29(2):123-31. DOI: 10.1080/03079450094153. View