» Articles » PMID: 36405573

What Constitutes Student Well-Being: A Scoping Review Of Students' Perspectives

Overview
Journal Child Indic Res
Publisher Springer
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2022 Nov 21
PMID 36405573
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Student well-being has recently emerged as a critical educational agenda due to its wide-reaching benefits for students in performing better at school and later as adults. With the emergence of student well-being as a priority area in educational policy and practice, efforts to measure and monitor student well-being have increased, and so has the number of student well-being domains proposed. Presently, a lack of consensus exists about what domains are appropriate to investigate and understand student well-being, resulting in a fragmented body of work. This paper aims to clarify the construct of student well-being by summarising and mapping different conceptualisations, approaches used to measure, and domains that entail well-being. The search of multiple databases identified 33 studies published in academic journals between 1989 and 2020. There were four approaches to conceptualising student well-being found in the reviewed studies. They were: Hedonic, eudaimonic, integrative (i.e., combining both hedonic and eudaimonic), and others. Results identified eight overarching domains of student well-being: Positive emotion, (lack of) Negative emotion, Relationships, Engagement, Accomplishment, Purpose at school, Intrapersonal/Internal factors, and Contextual/External factors. Recommendations for further research are offered, including the need for more qualitative research on student well-being as perceived and experienced by students and for research to be conducted in a non-western context.

Citing Articles

Beyond the first week: sustaining the feeling of social inclusion and sense of belonging for students.

Pinto A, Reed N, Mjoen O Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024; 19(1):2421032.

PMID: 39462458 PMC: 11514387. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2421032.


A scoping review of well-being measures: conceptualisation and scales for overall well-being.

Zhang W, Balloo K, Hosein A, Medland E BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):585.

PMID: 39443963 PMC: 11515516. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-02074-0.


Psychological wellbeing in Chinese university students: insights into the influences of academic self-concept, teacher support, and student engagement.

Zhang H Front Psychol. 2024; 14:1336682.

PMID: 38292520 PMC: 10824945. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1336682.


Development of immersive learning framework (ILF) in achieving the goals of higher education: measuring the impact using a pre-post design.

Devassy S, Scaria L, Metzger J, Thampi K, Jose J, Joseph B Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):17692.

PMID: 37848670 PMC: 10582005. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45035-0.

References
1.
Stalmeijer R, Dolmans D, Wolfhagen I, Muijtjens A, Scherpbier A . The development of an instrument for evaluating clinical teachers: involving stakeholders to determine content validity. Med Teach. 2008; 30(8):e272-7. DOI: 10.1080/01421590802258904. View

2.
McGarty A, Melville C . Parental perceptions of facilitators and barriers to physical activity for children with intellectual disabilities: A mixed methods systematic review. Res Dev Disabil. 2017; 73:40-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.12.007. View

3.
Mascia M, Agus M, Penna M . Emotional Intelligence, Self-Regulation, Smartphone Addiction: Which Relationship With Student Well-Being and Quality of Life?. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:375. PMC: 7068808. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00375. View

4.
Wright K, Golder S, Rodriguez-Lopez R . Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014; 14:73. PMC: 4048585. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-73. View

5.
Diener E . Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull. 1984; 95(3):542-75. View