» Articles » PMID: 36404834

Perceived Social Supports and Associated Factors Among Diabetes Mellitus Patients

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2022 Nov 21
PMID 36404834
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the Perceived Social Supports and Associated Factors Among Diabetes Mellitus Patients.

Methods And Materials: A facility-based cross-sectional study on 399 randomly selected adult diabetes patients was conducted at JUMC with data collection between August and September 2021.The data was collected using diabetic social support tool through face-to-face interviews and document review checklist. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with perceived social support in diabetes patients.

Result: Two hundred nineteen (54.9%) out of 399 diabetes patients reported a good level of perceived social support. Informational support was the most reported (55.4%), followed by emotional support (52.9%), companionship support (52.9%), and instrumental or tangible support (48.8%). Having a family history of diabetes (AOR = 1.90, CI: 1.09, 3.51) and presence of chronic comorbidities (AOR = 2.01; CI: 1.08, 3.75) were positively associated with social support. Whereas unemployment (AOR = 0.09, CI: 0.02, 0.38) was negatively associated with social support.

Conclusion And Recommendations: One of every two diabetes patients got adequate level of social support. Health care system, along with other stakeholders could strengthen social support in line with diabetes patients' lifestyle.

Citing Articles

Social Support for Thai Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Case-Control Study.

Aung T, Khin E, Moolphate S, Angkurawaranon C, Yuasa M, Aung M Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024; 17:3753-3765.

PMID: 39416727 PMC: 11481991. DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S478283.


Persons with Diabetes' Perceptions of Family Burden and Associated Factors.

Molla I, Berhie M, Debele K, Germossa G, Hailu F J Diabetes Res. 2023; 2023:8015721.

PMID: 36643789 PMC: 9836787. DOI: 10.1155/2023/8015721.

References
1.
Howteerakul N, Suwannapong N, Rittichu C, Rawdaree P . Adherence to regimens and glycemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes attending a tertiary hospital clinic. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2007; 19(1):43-9. DOI: 10.1177/10105395070190010901. View

2.
Williams R, Karuranga S, Malanda B, Saeedi P, Basit A, Besancon S . Global and regional estimates and projections of diabetes-related health expenditure: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020; 162:108072. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108072. View

3.
Hex N, Bartlett C, Wright D, Taylor M, Varley D . Estimating the current and future costs of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs. Diabet Med. 2012; 29(7):855-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03698.x. View

4.
Musenge E, Manankov A, Mudenda B, Michelo C . Glycaemic control in diabetic patients in Zambia. Pan Afr Med J. 2015; 19:354. PMC: 4407937. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2014.19.354.5264. View

5.
Munoz-Laboy M, Severson N, Perry A, Guilamo-Ramos V . Differential impact of types of social support in the mental health of formerly incarcerated Latino men. Am J Mens Health. 2013; 8(3):226-39. PMC: 4565496. DOI: 10.1177/1557988313508303. View