» Articles » PMID: 36401105

Impact of Shifting from Laparoscopic to Robotic Surgery During 600 Minimally Invasive Pancreatic and Liver Resections

Abstract

Background: Many centers worldwide are shifting from laparoscopic to robotic minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary resections (MIS-HPB) but large single center series assessing this process are lacking. We hypothesized that the introduction of robot-assisted surgery was safe and feasible in a high-volume center.

Methods: Single center, post-hoc assessment of prospectively collected data including all consecutive MIS-HPB resections (January 2010-February 2022). As of December 2018, all MIS pancreatoduodenectomy and liver resections were robot-assisted. All surgeons had participated in dedicated training programs for laparoscopic and robotic MIS-HPB. Primary outcomes were in-hospital/30-day mortality and Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 complications.

Results: Among 1875 pancreatic and liver resections, 600 (32%) were MIS-HPB resections. The overall rate of conversion was 4.3%, Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 complications 25.7%, and in-hospital/30-day mortality 1.8% (n = 11). When comparing the period before and after the introduction of robotic MIS-HPB (Dec 2018), the overall use of MIS-HPB increased from 25.3 to 43.8% (P < 0.001) and blood loss decreased from 250 ml [IQR 100-500] to 150 ml [IQR 50-300] (P < 0.001). The 291 MIS pancreatic resections included 163 MIS pancreatoduodenectomies (52 laparoscopic, 111 robotic) with 4.3% conversion rate. The implementation of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with reduced operation time (450 vs 361 min; P < 0.001), reduced blood loss (350 vs 200 ml; P < 0.001), and a decreased rate of delayed gastric emptying (28.8% vs 9.9%; P = 0.009). The 309 MIS liver resections included 198 laparoscopic and 111 robotic procedures with a 3.6% conversion rate. The implementation of robotic liver resection was associated with less overall complications (24.7% vs 10.8%; P = 0.003) and shorter hospital stay (4 vs 3 days; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The introduction of robotic surgery was associated with greater implementation of MIS-HPB in up to nearly half of all pancreatic and liver resections. Although mortality and major morbidity were not affected, robotic surgery was associated with improvements in some selected outcomes. Ultimately, randomized studies and high-quality registries should determine its added value.

Citing Articles

Surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in era of multidisciplinary strategies.

Takamoto T, Mihara Y, Nishioka Y, Ichida A, Kawaguchi Y, Akamatsu N Int J Clin Oncol. 2025; 30(3):417-426.

PMID: 39907863 PMC: 11842484. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-025-02703-7.


Perioperative outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Armengol-Garcia C, Blandin-Alvarez V, Sharma E, Salinas-Ruiz L, Gonzalez-Mendez M, Monteiro Dos Santos M Surg Endosc. 2025; 39(3):1462-1472.

PMID: 39880981 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11515-1.


Robotic liver parenchymal transection techniques: a comprehensive overview and classification.

Palucci M, Giannone F, Del Angel-Millan G, Alagia M, Del Basso C, Lodin M J Robot Surg. 2024; 19(1):36.

PMID: 39738738 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02200-5.


Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumors: a meta-analysis.

Tang G, Chen F, Chen R, Zhou R, Zhang J Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1486504.

PMID: 39629002 PMC: 11611710. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1486504.


The optimal choice for patients underwent minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis including patient subgroups.

Chen R, Xiao C, Song S, Zhu L, Zhang T, Liu R Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(11):6237-6253.

PMID: 39322827 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11289-6.


References
1.
Daskalaki D, Gonzalez-Heredia R, Brown M, Bianco F, Tzvetanov I, Davis M . Financial Impact of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery: A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes and Costs Between the Robotic and Open Technique in a Single Institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017; 27(4):375-382. PMC: 5397272. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0576. View

2.
Franken L, Benzing C, Krenzien F, Schmelzle M, van Dieren S, Olthof P . Right-sided resection with standard or selective portal vein resection in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2021; 24(3):391-397. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.06.429. View

3.
Strasberg S . Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005; 12(5):351-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00534-005-0999-7. View

4.
Wente M, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma D, Izbicki J . Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007; 142(5):761-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005. View

5.
Bjornsson B, Sandstrom P, Lindhoff Larsson A, Hjalmarsson C, Gasslander T . Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy (LAPOP): study protocol for a single center, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019; 20(1):356. PMC: 6567450. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3460-y. View