» Articles » PMID: 36400942

The Outcomes of Surgical Management Options for Adult Acquired Buried Penis

Overview
Journal Int J Impot Res
Date 2022 Nov 18
PMID 36400942
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Functional and surgical outcomes after surgical correction of adult acquired buried penis (AABP) are limited in the current literature. We retrospectively recruited patients underwent surgical treatment of AABP in a single institution from 2017 to 2021. Surgical repair was classified according to surgical complexity following Pariser-Santucci's classification. The primary endpoint of the study was the recurrence-free rate survival. The secondary endpoints were surgical, functional and patients' reported outcomes. Overall 28 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up was 27.5 (18.5-34.5). The most common complaints at presentation were sexual (53.6%) and voiding (39.3%) dysfunction. Surgical management steps ranged from circumcision to more complex procedures, such as suprapubic fat pad excision, abdominoplasty and/or penile shaft skin grafting. Overall postoperative complications were recorded in 32.1%. High-grade complications (Clavien≥3) occurred in 7.1%. One-year recurrence-free survival was 88.7%. Postoperatively IPSS and IIEF-15 questionnaires showed a significant improvement in urinary 8 (0-12) vs 2 (0-3), p = 0.03 and sexual function 37 (23-68) vs 68 (45-72), p = 0.001 respectively. Overall, patients reported functional improvement and 93.8% experienced a positive impact of QoL. AABP surgical repair, despite the high incidence of complications, seems to allow satisfactory outcomes and a significant improvement in patients' QoL.

Citing Articles

Concealed penis: A review of multilevel classification and surgical reconstruction techniques.

Xiang B, Peng J, Shang X, Zu X, Li D BJUI Compass. 2025; 6(1):e470.

PMID: 39877568 PMC: 11771508. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.470.


The Outcomes of Adult Acquired Buried Penis Surgical Reconstruction.

Falcone M, Plamadeala N, Cirigliano L, Preto M, Peretti F, Ferro I Life (Basel). 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39459621 PMC: 11509354. DOI: 10.3390/life14101321.


No difference between split-thickness and full-thickness skin grafts for surgical repair in adult acquired buried penis regarding surgical and functional outcomes: a comparative retrospective analysis.

Gul M, Plamadeala N, Falcone M, Preto M, Cirigliano L, Peretti F Int J Impot Res. 2024; .

PMID: 38326548 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-024-00832-7.


Lymphatic Mapping in the Repair of Adult-acquired Buried Penis: Proof of Concept.

Marantidis J, Song D, Venkatesan K, Shaw N Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023; 11(12):e5472.

PMID: 38093723 PMC: 10718383. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005472.

References
1.
Cohen P . Adult Acquired Buried Penis: A Hidden Problem in Obese Men. Cureus. 2021; 13(2):e13067. PMC: 7932830. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13067. View

2.
Hampson L, Muncey W, Chung P, Ma C, Friedrich J, Wessells H . Surgical and Functional Outcomes Following Buried Penis Repair With Limited Panniculectomy and Split-thickness Skin Graft. Urology. 2017; 110:234-238. PMC: 7025816. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.021. View

3.
Kirk P, Yi Y, Hadj-Moussa M, Malaeb B . Diversity of patient profile, urethral stricture, and other disease manifestations in a cohort of adult men with lichen sclerosus. Investig Clin Urol. 2016; 57(3):202-7. PMC: 4869564. DOI: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.3.202. View

4.
Knio Z, Kurban M, Abbas O . Lichen sclerosis: clinicopathological study of 60 cases from Lebanon. Int J Dermatol. 2016; 55(10):1076-81. DOI: 10.1111/ijd.13336. View

5.
Hughes D, Perez E, Garcia R, Aragon O, Erdmann D . Sexual and Overall Quality of Life Improvements After Surgical Correction of "Buried Penis". Ann Plast Surg. 2015; 76(5):532-5. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000378. View