» Articles » PMID: 36398265

Etiological Spectrum and Treatment Outcome of Wound Infection in Patients with Open Tibia and Fibula Fractures

Overview
Journal Am J Transl Res
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Nov 18
PMID 36398265
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To explore the etiology of wound infections in patients with open tibia and fibula fractures and the treatment effects.

Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 76 patients with open tibia and fibula fractures were included in this research. These patients were divided into the control group (n=38) and the observation group (n=38) according to the treatment methods for wound infection. The distribution and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria in wound infections were analyzed. Clinical effects, time for body temperature returning to normal, time for disappearance of exudates, time for clearance of pathogenic bacteria, recovery effects and patients' satisfaction rate were also compared between two groups.

Results: A total of 152 strains of pathogenic bacteria were separated. The main pathogenic bacterium was Acinetobacter baumannii, accounting for 30.92% (47/152). Pathogenic bacteria were demonstrated to be highly sensitive to vancomycin and imipenem. The proportion of wound healing by first intention and the Johner-Wruhs scores in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group, while recurrent infection rate, the time to restore normal body temperature, the time for exudates to disappear, the time to remove pathogenic bacteria, hospital stays and VAS scores in observation group were obviously shorter or lower than those in control group (all P<0.05). Moreover, the satisfaction rate of patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Understanding pathogenic characteristics and drug resistance of wound infection in patients with open tibia and fibula fractures is helpful to subsequent treatment. Comprehensive control measures should be taken to decrease incidence of wound infection.

References
1.
Wang D, Liu Y, Lv W, Liang W, Zhou X, Ding Y . Repetitive brief ischemia accelerates tibial shaft fracture healing: a 5-years prospective preliminary clinical trial (PCT). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):631. PMC: 8293516. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04515-y. View

2.
Sprague S, Schemitsch E, Swiontkowski M, Della Rocca G, Jeray K, Liew S . Factors Associated With Revision Surgery After Internal Fixation of Hip Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 32(5):223-230. PMC: 5986292. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001162. View

3.
Ketonis C, Dwyer J, Ilyas A . Timing of Debridement and Infection Rates in Open Fractures of the Hand: A Systematic Review. Hand (N Y). 2017; 12(2):119-126. PMC: 5349411. DOI: 10.1177/1558944716643294. View

4.
Simske N, Audet M, Kim C, Vallier H . Open ankle fractures are associated with complications and reoperations. OTA Int. 2021; 2(4):e042. PMC: 7997115. DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000042. View

5.
Vesterager J, Kristensen P, Petersen I, Pedersen A . Hospital variation in the risk of infection after hip fracture surgery: a population-based cohort study including 29,598 patients from 2012-2017. Acta Orthop. 2020; 92(2):215-221. PMC: 8158240. DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1863688. View