» Articles » PMID: 36397263

Precision Medicine Approach to Cochlear Implantation

Overview
Date 2022 Nov 18
PMID 36397263
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the early days of cochlear implantation (CI) surgery, when the types of electrodes were limited and the etiology of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was not well understood, the one-size-fits-all approach to CI held true, as in all other fields. However, in the era of personalized medicine, there have been attempts to associate CI performance with the etiology of SNHL and to establish customized surgical techniques that can maximize performance according to individual cochlear dimensions. Personalized genomic-driven assessments of CI candidates and a better understanding of genotype-phenotype correlations could provide clinically applicable diagnostic and prognostic information about questions such as who, how, and when to implant. Rigorous and strategic imaging assessments also provide better insights into the anatomic etiology of SNHL and cochlear dimensions, leading to individualized surgical techniques to augment CI outcomes. Furthermore, the precision medicine approach to CI is not necessarily limited to preoperative planning, but can be extended to either intraoperative electrode positioning or even the timing of the initial switch-on. In this review, we discuss the implications of personalized diagnoses (both genetic and nongenetic) on the planning and performance of CI in patients with prelingual and postlingual SNHL.

Citing Articles

Correlation between the etiology of severe hearing loss and endolymphatic hydrops.

Park S, Han J, Lee J, Choi B, Bae Y, Choi B Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 282(2):781-787.

PMID: 39373914 PMC: 11805888. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08993-3.


Clinical characteristics and hearing loss etiology of cochlear implantees undergoing surgery in their teens, 20s, and 30s.

Choe G, Lim J, Chun Y, Han J, Kim B, Choi B Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 281(10):5169-5177.

PMID: 38802577 PMC: 11416388. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08737-3.


The impact of the size and angle of the cochlear basal turn on translocation of a pre-curved mid-scala cochlear implant electrode.

Pai I, Connor S, Komninos C, Ourselin S, Bergeles C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):1024.

PMID: 38200135 PMC: 10781700. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47133-5.


Revisiting Genetic Epidemiology with a Refined Targeted Gene Panel for Hereditary Hearing Impairment in the Taiwanese Population.

Lee Y, Tsai C, Lu Y, Lin P, Chiang Y, Yang T Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(4).

PMID: 37107638 PMC: 10137978. DOI: 10.3390/genes14040880.

References
1.
Sharma A, Cardon G . Cortical development and neuroplasticity in Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder. Hear Res. 2015; 330(Pt B):221-32. PMC: 4675684. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.06.001. View

2.
Iwasaki S, Nakanishi H, Misawa K, Tanigawa T, Mizuta K . Cochlear implant in children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Audiol Neurootol. 2008; 14(3):146-52. DOI: 10.1159/000171476. View

3.
Yoshida H, Takahashi H, Kanda Y, Usami S . Long term speech perception after cochlear implant in pediatric patients with GJB2 mutations. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2013; 40(5):435-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2013.01.006. View

4.
Glastonbury C, Davidson H, Harnsberger H, Butler J, Kertesz T, Shelton C . Imaging findings of cochlear nerve deficiency. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23(4):635-43. PMC: 7975095. View

5.
Shew M, Walia A, Durakovic N, Valenzuela C, Wick C, McJunkin J . Long-term Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception Performance Outcomes With the Slim Modiolar Electrode. Otol Neurotol. 2021; 42(10):e1486-e1493. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003342. View