» Articles » PMID: 36394033

Biomechanical Influence of T1 Tilt Alteration on Adjacent Segments After Anterior Cervical Fusion

Overview
Date 2022 Nov 17
PMID 36394033
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anterior cervical fusion (ACF) has become a standard treatment approach to effectively alleviate symptoms in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. However, alteration of cervical sagittal alignment may accelerate degeneration at segments adjacent to the fusion and thereby compromise the surgical outcome. It remains unknown whether changes in T1 tilt, an important parameter of cervical sagittal alignment, may cause redistribution of biomechanical loading on adjacent segments after ACF surgery. The objective was to examine the effects of T1 tilt angles on biomechanical responses (i.e.range of motion (ROM) and intradiscal VonMises stress) of the cervical spine before and after ACF. C2-T1 FE models for pre- and postoperative C4-C6 fusion were constructed on the basis of our previous work. Varying T1 tilts of -10°, -5°, 0°, 5°, and 10° were modeled with an imposed flexion-extension rotation at the T1 inferior endplate for the C2-T1 models. The flexion-extension ROM and intradiscal VonMises stress of functional spinal units were compared between the pre- and postoperative C2-T1 FE models of different T1 tilts. The spinal segments adjacent to ACF demonstrated higher ROM ratios after the operation regardless of T1 tilt. The segmental ROM ratio distribution was influenced as T1 tilt varied and loading conditions, which were more obvious during displacement-control loading of extension. Regardless of T1 tilt, intradiscal VonMises stress was greatly increased at the adjacent segments after the operation. As T1 tilt increased, intradiscal stress at C3-C4 decreased under 30° flexion and increased under 15° extension. The contrary trend was observed at the C6-C7 segment, where the intradiscal stress increased with the increasing T1 tilt under 30° flexion and decreased under 15° extension. T1 tilt change may change biomechanical loadings of cervical spine segments, especially of the adjacent segments after ACF. Extension may be more susceptible to T1 tilt change.

Citing Articles

An Eclectic Review on Dicarboxylic Acid Production Through Yeast Cell Factories and Its Industrial Prominence.

Kayalvizhi R, Sanjana J, Jacob S, Kumar V Curr Microbiol. 2024; 81(6):147.

PMID: 38642080 DOI: 10.1007/s00284-024-03654-4.


Finite Element Modeling of the Human Wrist: A Review.

Mena A, Wollstein R, Baus J, Yang J J Wrist Surg. 2024; 12(6):478-487.

PMID: 38213568 PMC: 10781520. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768930.

References
1.
Iyer S, Nemani V, Nguyen J, Elysee J, Burapachaisri A, Ames C . Impact of Cervical Sagittal Alignment Parameters on Neck Disability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 41(5):371-7. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001221. View

2.
Eck J, Humphreys S, Lim T, Jeong S, Kim J, Hodges S . Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(22):2431-4. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00003. View

3.
Liu Y, Li N, Wei W, Deng J, Hu Y, Ye B . Prognostic Value of Lordosis Decrease in Radiographic Adjacent Segment Pathology After Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):14414. PMC: 5663916. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14300-4. View

4.
Aghayev K, Doulgeris J, Gonzalez-Blohm S, Eleraky M, Lee 3rd W, Vrionis F . Biomechanical comparison of a two-level anterior discectomy and a one-level corpectomy, combined with fusion and anterior plate reconstruction in the cervical spine. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2013; 29(1):21-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.10.016. View

5.
Natarajan R, Chen B, An H, Andersson G . Anterior cervical fusion: a finite element model study on motion segment stability including the effect of osteoporosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(8):955-61. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200004150-00010. View