» Articles » PMID: 36384245

Predicting In-hospital Mortality in Pulmonary Embolism Patients: Development and External Validation of the PATHOS Score

Abstract

Objective: According to the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on pulmonary embolism (PE), prognosis is calculated using the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI), a complex score with debated validity, or simplified PESI (sPESI). We have developed and validated a new risk score for in-hospital mortality (IHM) of patients with PE in the emergency department.

Methods: This retrospective, dual-center cohort study was conducted in the emergency departments of two third-level university hospitals. Patients aged >18 years with a contrast-enhanced computed tomography-confirmed PE were included. Clinical variables and laboratory tests were evaluated blindly to IHM. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the new score's predictors, and the new score was compared with the PESI, sPESI, and shock index.

Results: A total of 1,358 patients were included in this study: 586 in the derivation cohort and 772 in the validation cohort, with a global 10.6% of IHM. The PATHOS scores were developed using independent variables to predict mortality: platelet count, age, troponin, heart rate, oxygenation, and systolic blood pressure. The PATHOS score showed good calibration and high discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.89) in the derivation population and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68-0.80) in the validation cohort, which is significantly higher than the PESI, sPESI, and shock index in both cohorts (P<0.01 for all comparisons).

Conclusion: PATHOS is a simple and effective prognostic score for predicting IHM in patients with PE in an emergency setting.

References
1.
Gokcek K, Gokcek A, Demir A, Yildirim B, Acar E, Alatas O . In-hospital mortality of acute pulmonary embolism: Predictive value of shock index, modified shock index, and age shock index scores. Med Clin (Barc). 2021; 158(8):351-355. DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2021.04.035. View

2.
Barnes G, Muzikansky A, Cameron S, Giri J, Heresi G, Jaber W . Comparison of 4 Acute Pulmonary Embolism Mortality Risk Scores in Patients Evaluated by Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(8):e2010779. PMC: 7450352. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10779. View

3.
Daquarti G, March Vecchio N, Mitrione C, Furmento J, Ametrano M, Dominguez Pace M . High-sensitivity troponin and right ventricular function in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Emerg Med. 2016; 34(8):1579-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.05.071. View

4.
Wendelboe A, Raskob G . Global Burden of Thrombosis: Epidemiologic Aspects. Circ Res. 2016; 118(9):1340-7. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306841. View

5.
Burgos L, Scatularo C, Cigalini I, Jauregui J, Bernal M, Bonorino J . The addition of echocardiographic parameters to PESI risk score improves mortality prediction in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: PESI-Echo score. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021; 10(3):250-257. PMC: 8241311. DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa007. View