» Articles » PMID: 36381431

The Relationship Between Trauma Scoring Systems and Outcomes in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview
Date 2022 Nov 16
PMID 36381431
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the relationship between trauma scoring systems and outcomes in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods: From January 2018 to June 2021, 1,122 patients with severe TBI were registered in the Korean Neuro-Trauma Data Bank System. Among them, 697 patients with data on trauma scoring systems were included in the study. According to the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score, the patients were divided into unfavorable and favorable outcome groups. The abbreviated injury scale (AIS), injury severity score (ISS), revised trauma score (RTS), and trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) were evaluated.

Results: The AIS head score was higher in the unfavorable outcome group than in the favorable outcome group (4.39 vs. 4.06, <0.001). ISS was also higher in the unfavorable outcome group (27.27 vs. 24.22, =0.001). The RTS and TRISS were higher in the favorable outcome group (RTS, 4.74 vs. 5.45, <0.001; TRISS, 48.05 vs. 71.02, <0.001). In comparing the survival and death groups, the ISS was lower in the survival group (25.76 vs. 27.29, =0.036). Furthermore, RTS was higher in the survival group (5.26 vs. 4.54, <0.001), as was TRISS (62.11 vs. 44.91, <0.001).

Conclusion: Trauma scoring systems, including ISS, RTS, and TRISS, provide tools for quantifying posttraumatic risk and can be used to predict prognosis. Among these, TRISS is an indicator of the predicted survival rate and is considered a clinically useful tool for predicting unfavorable and favorable outcomes in patients with severe TBI.

Citing Articles

External validation of an artificial intelligence model using clinical variables, including ICD-10 codes, for predicting in-hospital mortality among trauma patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Lee S, Kim D, Oh N, Lee H, Park S, Yon D Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1100.

PMID: 39775076 PMC: 11707174. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85420-5.


Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score for Predicting Mortality among Older Korean Adults with Trauma: Is It Applicable in All Cases?.

Han J, Yoon S, Seok J, Lee J, Lee J, Ye J Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2024; 28(4):484-490.

PMID: 39192823 PMC: 11695760. DOI: 10.4235/agmr.24.0095.


Epidemiology and Outcomes of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Regional Trauma Center in Incheon, Korea, 2018-2022.

Hwang I, Jeong T, Kim W, Kim J, Jang M Korean J Neurotrauma. 2024; 20(1):17-26.

PMID: 38576499 PMC: 10990697. DOI: 10.13004/kjnt.2024.20.e9.

References
1.
Osler T, Rutledge R, Deis J, Bedrick E . ICISS: an international classification of disease-9 based injury severity score. J Trauma. 1996; 41(3):380-6; discussion 386-8. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199609000-00002. View

2.
. Rating the severity of tissue damage. I. The abbreviated scale. JAMA. 1971; 215(2):277-80. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1971.03180150059012. View

3.
Susman M, DiRusso S, Sullivan T, Risucci D, Nealon P, Cuff S . Traumatic brain injury in the elderly: increased mortality and worse functional outcome at discharge despite lower injury severity. J Trauma. 2002; 53(2):219-23; discussion 223-4. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200208000-00004. View

4.
Kim S, Chae S . Promising candidate cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of seizure disorder, infection, inflammation, tumor, and traumatic brain injury in pediatric patients. Clin Exp Pediatr. 2021; 65(2):56-64. PMC: 8841973. DOI: 10.3345/cep.2021.00241. View

5.
Steyerberg E, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, Butcher I, Lu J, McHugh G . Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med. 2008; 5(8):e165. PMC: 2494563. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050165. View