» Articles » PMID: 36376988

Using the Derived 28-joint Disease Activity Score Patient-reported Components (DAS28-P) Index As a Discriminatory Measure of Response to Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drug Therapy in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Overview
Journal BMC Rheumatol
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2022 Nov 15
PMID 36376988
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) is a widely used measure to assess disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The DAS28-P index, a derived proportion of the patient-reported components (joint tenderness and patient global assessment) within the DAS28, has been utilized as a discriminatory measure of non-inflammatory pain mechanisms in RA. This study aimed to evaluate the use of the DAS28-P index as a predictor of treatment response in early RA.

Methods: Patients with early RA enrolled in a supplemental fish oil clinical trial received a combination of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) according to a 'treat-to-target' protocol. First, consecutive measures of the DAS28-P index, derived from the DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), at each visit over a 1-year period were estimated for each patient. Then, distinct subgroups of treatment responders based on the trajectories of the DAS28-P indices were identified using bivariate k-means cluster analysis. Data on baseline predictors as well as longitudinal outcomes of disease impact and DMARD use over a 1-year period and radiographic progression over a 3-year period were collected and analyzed using a random intercept, population-averaged generalized estimating equation model.

Results: 121 patients were included (74% female; mean age of 57; median of 16 weeks of active disease) and a 3-cluster model was identified-the 'Responders' group (n = 58; 48%), the 'Partial Responders' group (n = 32; 26%), and the 'Non-Responders' group (n = 31; 26%). The 'Partial Responders' group had consistently higher proportions of the DAS28-P index throughout the study period and had minimal radiographic progression over time, with the lowest joint erosion score of 0.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2, 1.6], observed at the 3-year follow-up. At 52 weeks, the methotrexate dose was higher for both 'Partial Responders' and 'Non-Responders' groups (18.5 mg [95% CI 15.5, 21.5] and 18.6 mg [95% CI 15.3, 21.8] respectively), when compared with the 'Responders' group (12.8 mg [95% CI 14.7, 20.9]).

Conclusions: Persistently high DAS28-P index scores are useful to distinguish poor patient global assessment and excessive treatment escalation in early RA, suggestive of underlying non-inflammatory pain contributing to higher disease activity score. Early identification of patients with discordant subjective and objective components of composite disease activity measures may allow better tailoring of treatment in RA.

Citing Articles

Association of single nucleotide polymorphism rs3213119 variant of gene in diagnosed Rheumatoid Arthritis patients.

Mushtaq I, Rashid A, Fakhr A, Majeed A, Rathore A, Baig Z Pak J Med Sci. 2024; 40(5):864-869.

PMID: 38827841 PMC: 11140329. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.40.5.7671.


Prognostic modeling in early rheumatoid arthritis: reconsidering the predictive role of disease activity scores.

Bird A, Oakden-Rayner L, Smith L, Zeng M, Ray S, Proudman S Clin Rheumatol. 2024; 43(5):1503-1512.

PMID: 38536518 PMC: 11018671. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-024-06946-z.


Oxidative DNA Damage and Zinc Status in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Duhok, Iraq.

Hassan Sr W Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e52860.

PMID: 38406004 PMC: 10886431. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52860.


Trajectories of self-reported pain-related health outcomes and longitudinal effects on medication use in rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective cohort analysis using the Australian Rheumatology Association Database (ARAD).

Pisaniello H, Lester S, Russell O, Black R, Tieu J, Richards B RMD Open. 2023; 9(3).

PMID: 37507204 PMC: 10391633. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002962.


Overtreatment in rheumatoid arthritis: are there reasons for concern?.

Ferreira R, Gossec L, Da Silva J RMD Open. 2022; 8(2).

PMID: 36180100 PMC: 9528607. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002212.

References
1.
Landewe R . Overdiagnosis and overtreatment in rheumatology: a little caution is in order. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018; 77(10):1394-1396. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213700. View

2.
McWilliams D, Kiely P, Young A, Joharatnam N, Wilson D, Walsh D . Interpretation of DAS28 and its components in the assessment of inflammatory and non-inflammatory aspects of rheumatoid arthritis. BMC Rheumatol. 2019; 2:8. PMC: 6390559. DOI: 10.1186/s41927-018-0016-9. View

3.
van der Heijde D, vant Hof M, van Riel P, van de Putte L . Disease activity score. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992; 51(1):140. View

4.
Wallace B, Moore M, Heisler A, Muhammad L, Song J, Clauw D . Fibromyalgianess and glucocorticoid persistence among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021; 61(4):1556-1562. PMC: 9216041. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab583. View

5.
Ferreira R, Ndosi M, de Wit M, Santos E, Duarte C, Jacobs J . Dual target strategy: a proposal to mitigate the risk of overtreatment and enhance patient satisfaction in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018; 78(10):e109. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214199. View