Experiences of Caregivers of Community-dwelling Older Persons with Moderate to Advanced Dementia in Adapting the Namaste Care Program: a Qualitative Descriptive Study

Overview

Journal Res Involv Engagem

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2022 Nov 12

PMID 36371288

Authors

Marie-Lee Yous

Jenny Ploeg

Sharon Kaasalainen

Carrie McAiney

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Globally many older persons with dementia are living at home to maintain independence within the community. As older persons with dementia transition from early to moderate or advanced stages of dementia they require more support from family members and friends to complete their daily activities. Family and friend caregivers, however, often report a lack of preparation for their caregiving role. There are few psychosocial programs that can be delivered by caregivers of community-dwelling older persons with moderate to advanced dementia. Namaste Care is a psychosocial intervention, predominantly used in long-term care, to improve the quality of life of persons with advanced dementia. Namaste Care provides multisensory stimulation for persons with dementia through meaningful activities such as music, massage, aromatherapy, and nutrition. There have been limited attempts at adapting Namaste Care for use by caregivers in the community.There is a need to involve caregivers in adapting programs and understanding their experiences in research involvement so that strategies can be put in place for a positive experience. The purpose of this study is to explore the experiences of caregivers who participated in workshop sessions to adapt Namaste Care for community-dwelling older persons with moderate to advanced dementia.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was used. Six caregivers residing in Ontario, Canada attended virtual workshop sessions (i.e., by phone or videoconference) that were guided by the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) Patient Engagement Framework. Caregivers completed individual post-workshop interviews. Experiential thematic analysis was used to analyze interviews and post-interview researcher notes.

Results: Key findings were that caregivers had a positive experience in adapting Namaste Care by learning how to improve their caregiving skills and being supported to engage in research through multiple facilitators such as flexible scheduling and an inclusive and respectful environment. Having designated time for discussions between caregivers was perceived as important to forming partnerships within the group to support co-creation of knowledge.

Conclusion: Findings support the need to improve caregiver research engagement processes by ensuring that caregivers can benefit through learning opportunities and discussions and empowering caregivers to value their contributions in adapting interventions.

Citing Articles

Implementing Namaste Care in nursing care homes for people with advanced dementia: a systematically constructed review with framework synthesis.

Salvi S, Preston N, Cornally N, Walshe C BMC Geriatr. 2025; 25(1):17.

PMID: 39789441 PMC: 11716343. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05636-4.

References

Hole G, Brenna S, Graverholt B, Ciliska D, Nortvedt M . Educating change agents: a qualitative descriptive study of graduates of a Master's program in evidence-based practice. BMC Med Educ. 2016; 16:71. PMC: 4768336. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0597-1. View

Domecq J, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N . Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:89. PMC: 3938901. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89. View

Roland K, Chappell N . Meaningful activity for persons with dementia: family caregiver perspectives. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015; 30(6):559-68. PMC: 10852756. DOI: 10.1177/1533317515576389. View

Vedel I, Sheets D, McAiney C, Clare L, Brodaty H, Mann J . CCCDTD5: Individual and community-based psychosocial and other non-pharmacological interventions to support persons living with dementia and their caregivers. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2020; 6(1):e12086. PMC: 7657138. DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12086. View

Sandelowski M . Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Res Nurs Health. 2000; 23(4):334-40. DOI: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g. View

Gheduzzi E, Morelli N, Graffigna G, Masella C . Facilitating co-production in public services: Empirical evidence from a co-design experience with family caregivers living in a remote and rural area. Health Serv Manage Res. 2020; 34(1):21-35. DOI: 10.1177/0951484820971452. View

McAtee R, Spradley L, Tobey L, Thomasson W, Azhar G, Mercado C . Caregiver Burden: Caregiving Workshops Have a Positive Impact on Those Caring for Individuals With Dementia in Arkansas. J Patient Exp. 2021; 8:23743735211018085. PMC: 8205323. DOI: 10.1177/23743735211018085. View

Chalmers I, Glasziou P . Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009; 374(9683):86-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9. View

Bethell J, Pringle D, Chambers L, Cohen C, Commisso E, Cowan K . Patient and Public Involvement in Identifying Dementia Research Priorities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018; 66(8):1608-1612. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15453. View

10.

Wiersma E, OConnor D, Loiselle L, Hickman K, Heibein B, Hounam B . Creating space for citizenship: The impact of group structure on validating the voices of people with dementia. Dementia (London). 2016; 15(3):414-33. DOI: 10.1177/1471301216642339. View

11.

Corey K, McCurry M . When Caregiving Ends: The Experiences of Former Family Caregivers of People With Dementia. Gerontologist. 2017; 58(2):e87-e96. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnw205. View

12.

Dalkin S, Lhussier M, Kendall N, Atkinson J, Tolman S . Namaste care in the home setting: developing initial realist explanatory theories and uncovering unintended outcomes. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(1):e033046. PMC: 7045233. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033046. View

13.

McConnell T, Best P, Davidson G, McEneaney T, Cantrell C, Tully M . Coproduction for feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trials: learning outcomes for community partners, service users and the research team. Res Involv Engagem. 2018; 4:32. PMC: 6174568. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-018-0116-0. View

14.

Phoenix M, Nguyen T, Gentles S, VanderKaay S, Cross A, Nguyen L . Using qualitative research perspectives to inform patient engagement in research. Res Involv Engagem. 2018; 4:20. PMC: 6034277. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-018-0107-1. View

15.

DiZazzo-Miller R, Winston K, Winkler S, Donovan M . Family Caregiver Training Program (FCTP): A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Occup Ther. 2017; 71(5):7105190010p1-7105190010p10. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2017.022459. View

16.

Yous M, Ploeg J, Kaasalainen S, McAiney C . Adapting the Namaste Care Program for Use with Caregivers of Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Moderate to Advanced Dementia: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Can J Aging. 2022; 42(2):271-283. DOI: 10.1017/S0714980822000174. View

17.

Burgio L, Collins I, Schmid B, Wharton T, McCallum D, DeCoster J . Translating the REACH caregiver intervention for use by area agency on aging personnel: the REACH OUT program. Gerontologist. 2009; 49(1):103-16. PMC: 3695600. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnp012. View

18.

Black B, Johnston D, Rabins P, Morrison A, Lyketsos C, Samus Q . Unmet needs of community-residing persons with dementia and their informal caregivers: findings from the maximizing independence at home study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014; 61(12):2087-2095. PMC: 4001885. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12549. View

19.

Forsythe L, Carman K, Szydlowski V, Fayish L, Davidson L, Hickam D . Patient Engagement In Research: Early Findings From The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019; 38(3):359-367. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05067. View

20.

Llanque S, Enriquez M, Cheng A, Doty L, Brotto M, Kelly P . The family series workshop: a community-based psychoeducational intervention. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015; 30(6):573-83. PMC: 4508226. DOI: 10.1177/1533317514568003. View