A Multinational Investigation of Healthcare Needs, Preferences, and Expectations in Supportive Cancer Care: Co-creating the LifeChamps Digital Platform

Overview

Journal J Cancer Surviv

Specialty Oncology

Date 2022 Nov 11

PMID 36367615

Authors

Rebecca Marshall-McKenna

Grigorios Kotronoulas

Emmanouil Kokoroskos

Andrea Gil Granados

Panagiotis Papachristou

Nikolaos Papachristou

Gonzalo Collantes

Georgios Petridis

Antonis Billis

Panagiotis D Bamidis

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: This study is to evaluate healthcare needs, preferences, and expectations in supportive cancer care as perceived by cancer survivors, family caregivers, and healthcare professionals.

Methods: Key stakeholders consisted of cancer survivors diagnosed with breast cancer, prostate cancer, or melanoma; adult family caregivers; and healthcare professionals involved in oncology. Recruitment was via several routes, and data were collected via either online surveys or telephone interviews in Greece, Spain, Sweden, and the UK. Framework analysis was applied to the dataset.

Results: One hundred and fifty-five stakeholders participated: 70 cancer survivors, 23 family caregivers, and 62 healthcare professionals (13 clinical roles). Cancer survivors and family caregivers' needs included information and support on practical/daily living, as frustration was apparent with the lack of follow-up services. Healthcare professionals agreed on a multidisciplinary health service with a "focus on the patient" and availability closer to home. Most healthcare professionals acknowledged that patient-reported outcomes may provide "better individualised care". Cancer survivors and family caregivers generally felt that the digital platform would be useful for timely personalised support and aided communication. Healthcare professionals were supportive of the "proactive" functionality of the platform and the expected advantages. Anticipated challenges were integration obstacles such as workload/infrastructure and training/support in using the new technology.

Conclusions: Obtaining key stakeholders' insights provided a foundation for action to further co-create the LifeChamps digital platform to meet needs and priorities and deliver enhanced supportive care to "older" cancer survivors.

Implications For Cancer Survivors: Co-creation provided insight into gaps where digital support may enhance health and well-being.

Citing Articles

Systematic review of the needs and health-related quality of life domains relevant to people surviving cancer in Europe.

Amat-Fernandez C, Garin O, Luer-Aguila R, Pardo Y, Briseno R, Lizano-Barrantes C Qual Life Res. 2025; .

PMID: 39847267 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03884-w.

Posttreatment health interventions for adult cancer survivors and their families: an integrated review.

Coyne E, Dieperink K, Voltelen B, Barreto M, Garcia-Vivar C Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(11):712.

PMID: 39377934 PMC: 11461586. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08909-1.

Patient Co-Creation Initiatives in the Ambulatory Care Setting during COVID-19: A Systematic Review.

Lieneck C, Pacheco G, Cole M, Hipp L, Leal G, Matamoros K Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(1).

PMID: 38256372 PMC: 10818531. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010111.

Analytical exploratory tool for healthcare professionals to monitor cancer patients' progress.

Valero-Ramon Z, Fernandez-Llatas C, Collantes G, Valdivieso B, Billis A, Bamidis P Front Oncol. 2023; 12:1043411.

PMID: 36698423 PMC: 9869047. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1043411.

References

Janssen F, Bardoutsos A, El Gewily S, de Beer J . Future life expectancy in Europe taking into account the impact of smoking, obesity, and alcohol. Elife. 2021; 10. PMC: 8337079. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.66590. View

Van Herck Y, Feyaerts A, Alibhai S, Papamichael D, Decoster L, Lambrechts Y . Is cancer biology different in older patients?. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022; 2(10):e663-e677. DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00179-3. View

Williams G, Deal A, Lund J, Chang Y, Muss H, Pergolotti M . Patient-Reported Comorbidity and Survival in Older Adults with Cancer. Oncologist. 2017; 23(4):433-439. PMC: 5896706. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0404. View

Penson R, Daniels K, Lynch Jr T . Too old to care?. Oncologist. 2004; 9(3):343-52. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.9-3-343. View

Blasiak J, Chojnacki J, Pawlowska E, Szczepanska J, Chojnacki C . Nutrition in Cancer Therapy in the Elderly-An Epigenetic Connection?. Nutrients. 2020; 12(11). PMC: 7692262. DOI: 10.3390/nu12113366. View

Lockenhoff C, De Fruyt F, Terracciano A, McCrae R, De Bolle M, Costa Jr P . Perceptions of aging across 26 cultures and their culture-level associates. Psychol Aging. 2009; 24(4):941-54. PMC: 2933107. DOI: 10.1037/a0016901. View

Schroyen S, Marquet M, Jerusalem G, Dardenne B, van den Akker M, Buntinx F . The link between self-perceptions of aging, cancer view and physical and mental health of older people with cancer: A cross-sectional study. J Geriatr Oncol. 2016; 8(1):64-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.09.001. View

Kenis C, Bron D, Libert Y, Decoster L, Van Puyvelde K, Scalliet P . Relevance of a systematic geriatric screening and assessment in older patients with cancer: results of a prospective multicentric study. Ann Oncol. 2013; 24(5):1306-12. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds619. View

Habr D, McRoy L, Papadimitrakopoulou V . Age Is Just a Number: Considerations for Older Adults in Cancer Clinical Trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021; 113(11):1460-1464. PMC: 8562957. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab070. View

10.

Extermann M, Brain E, Canin B, Cherian M, Cheung K, de Glas N . Priorities for the global advancement of care for older adults with cancer: an update of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology Priorities Initiative. Lancet Oncol. 2021; 22(1):e29-e36. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30473-3. View

11.

Liu R, Sundaresan T, Reed M, Trosman J, Weldon C, Kolevska T . Telehealth in Oncology During the COVID-19 Outbreak: Bringing the House Call Back Virtually. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020; 16(6):289-293. DOI: 10.1200/OP.20.00199. View

12.

Mercantini P, Lucarini A, Mazzuca F, Osti M, Laghi A . How technology can help in oncologic patient management during COVID-19 outbreak. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020; 46(6):1189-1191. PMC: 7192092. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.050. View

13.

Penedo F, Oswald L, Kronenfeld J, Garcia S, Cella D, Yanez B . The increasing value of eHealth in the delivery of patient-centred cancer care. Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21(5):e240-e251. PMC: 7643123. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30021-8. View

14.

Burbury K, Wong Z, Yip D, Thomas H, Brooks P, Gilham L . Telehealth in cancer care: during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Intern Med J. 2021; 51(1):125-133. PMC: 8014764. DOI: 10.1111/imj.15039. View

15.

Ware P, Bartlett S, Pare G, Symeonidis I, Tannenbaum C, Bartlett G . Using eHealth Technologies: Interests, Preferences, and Concerns of Older Adults. Interact J Med Res. 2017; 6(1):e3. PMC: 5383803. DOI: 10.2196/ijmr.4447. View

16.

Rasche P, Wille M, Brohl C, Theis S, Schafer K, Knobe M . Prevalence of Health App Use Among Older Adults in Germany: National Survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018; 6(1):e26. PMC: 5801520. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.8619. View

17.

Dunham M, Bonacaro A, Schofield P, Bacon L, Spyridonis F, Mehrpouya H . Smartphone Applications Designed to Improve Older People's Chronic Pain Management: An Integrated Systematic Review. Geriatrics (Basel). 2021; 6(2). PMC: 8167560. DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics6020040. View

18.

Kruse C, Fohn J, Wilson N, Nunez Patlan E, Zipp S, Mileski M . Utilization Barriers and Medical Outcomes Commensurate With the Use of Telehealth Among Older Adults: Systematic Review. JMIR Med Inform. 2020; 8(8):e20359. PMC: 7450384. DOI: 10.2196/20359. View

19.

Buneviciene I, Mekary R, Smith T, Onnela J, Bunevicius A . Can mHealth interventions improve quality of life of cancer patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020; 157:103123. PMC: 7574857. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103123. View

20.

Moore C, Hassett D, Dunne S . Health literacy in cancer caregivers: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv. 2021; 15(6):825-836. DOI: 10.1007/s11764-020-00975-8. View