Subjective Estimates of Total Processing Time in Dual-tasking: (some) Good News for Bad Introspection

Overview

Journal Psychol Res

Specialty Psychology

Date 2022 Nov 11

PMID 36367568

Authors

Daniel Bratzke

Donna Bryce

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Previous studies have shown severe distortions of introspection about dual-task interference in the Psychological Refractory Period (PRP) paradigm. The present study investigated participants' ability to introspect about the total trial time in this paradigm, as this temporal information may arguably be more relevant for strategic task scheduling than subjective estimates of each task within the dual task. To this end, participants provided estimates of their reaction times (IRTs) for the two subtasks in one half of the experiment, and estimates of the total trial time (ITTs) in the other half of the experiment. Although the IRT results showed the typical unawareness of the PRP effect, ITTs reflected the effects of SOA and Task 2 difficulty on objective total trial time. Additional analyses showed that IRTs were influenced by the introspective task order; that is, the ITT pattern carried over to IRTs when IRTs were assessed in the second half of the experiment. Overall, the present results show that people are able to accurately introspect about total trial time in the PRP paradigm and thus provide some good news for bad introspection in the PRP paradigm.

References

Strobach T, Kubler S, Schubert T . A Gratton-like effect concerning task order in dual-task situations. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021; 217:103328. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103328. View

van Rijn H, Taatgen N . Timing of multiple overlapping intervals: how many clocks do we have?. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008; 129(3):365-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.002. View

Bryce D, Bratzke D . Are introspective reaction times affected by the method of time estimation? A comparison of visual analogue scales and reproduction. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014; 77(3):978-84. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0804-2. View

Bryce D, Bratzke D . Introspective reports of reaction times in dual-tasks reflect experienced difficulty rather than timing of cognitive processes. Conscious Cogn. 2014; 27:254-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.05.011. View

Marti S, Sackur J, Sigman M, Dehaene S . Mapping introspection's blind spot: reconstruction of dual-task phenomenology using quantified introspection. Cognition. 2010; 115(2):303-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.003. View

Bratzke D, Bryce D . Temporal discrimination of one's own reaction times in dual-task performance: Context effects and methodological constraints. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016; 78(6):1806-16. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1161-0. View

Salvucci D . A multitasking general executive for compound continuous tasks. Cogn Sci. 2011; 29(3):457-92. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_19. View

Bratzke D, Janczyk M . Introspection about backward crosstalk in dual-task performance. Psychol Res. 2020; 85(2):605-617. PMC: 7900044. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01282-3. View

Bryce D, Bratzke D . Are participants' reports of their own reaction times reliable? Re-examining introspective limitations in active and passive dual-task paradigms. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016; 172:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.10.007. View

10.

Brainard D . The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis. 1997; 10(4):433-6. View

11.

Bratzke D, Bryce D . Introspection is not always blind to the costs of multitasking: The case of task switching. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018; 45(6):980-992. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000635. View

12.

Foerster A, Pfister R, Reuss H, Kunde W . Commentary: Feeling the Conflict: The Crucial Role of Conflict Experience in Adaptation. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1405. PMC: 5601984. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01405. View

13.

Janczyk M . Sequential modulation of backward crosstalk and task-shielding in dual-tasking. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015; 42(5):631-47. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000170. View

14.

Bryce D, Bratzke D . Multiple timing of nested intervals: Further evidence for a weighted sum of segments account. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015; 23(1):317-23. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0877-5. View

15.

Bratzke D, Bryce D, Seifried-Dubon T . Distorted subjective reports of stimulus onsets under dual-task conditions: Delayed conscious perception or estimation bias?. Conscious Cogn. 2014; 30:36-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.07.016. View

16.

Thompson V, Prowse Turner J, Pennycook G . Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cogn Psychol. 2011; 63(3):107-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001. View

17.

Bryce D, Seifried-Dubon T, Bratzke D . How are overlapping time intervals perceived? Evidence for a weighted sum of segments model. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015; 156:83-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.12.007. View

18.

Pashler H . Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bull. 1994; 116(2):220-44. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220. View

19.

Bratzke D, Bryce D . Timing of internal processes: Investigating introspection about the costs of task switching and memory search. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022; 84(5):1501-1508. PMC: 9232406. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02510-6. View

20.

Corallo G, Sackur J, Dehaene S, Sigman M . Limits on introspection: distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck. Psychol Sci. 2008; 19(11):1110-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02211.x. View