» Articles » PMID: 36365837

Stress Monitoring Using Wearable Sensors: A Pilot Study and Stress-Predict Dataset

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 Nov 11
PMID 36365837
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the recent advancements in the field of wearable technologies, the opportunity to monitor stress continuously using different physiological variables has gained significant interest. The early detection of stress can help improve healthcare and minimizes the negative impact of long-term stress. This paper reports outcomes of a pilot study and associated stress-monitoring dataset, named the "Stress-Predict Dataset", created by collecting physiological signals from healthy subjects using wrist-worn watches with a photoplethysmogram (PPG) sensor. While wearing these watches, 35 healthy volunteers underwent a series of tasks (i.e., Stroop color test, Trier Social Stress Test and Hyperventilation Provocation Test), along with a rest period in-between each task. They also answered questionnaires designed to induce stress levels compatible with daily life. The changes in the blood volume pulse (BVP) and heart rate were recorded by the watch and were labelled as occurring during stress-inducing tasks or a rest period (no stress). Additionally, respiratory rate was estimated using the BVP signal. Statistical models and personalised adaptive reference ranges were used to determine the utility of the proposed stressors and the extracted variables (heart rate and respiratory rate). The analysis showed that the interview session was the most significant stress stimulus, causing a significant variation in heart rate of 27 (77%) participants and respiratory rate of 28 (80%) participants out of 35. The outcomes of this study contribute to the understanding the role of stressors and their association with physiological response and provide a dataset to help develop new wearable solutions for more reliable, valid, and sensitive physio-logical stress monitoring.

Citing Articles

Examining the challenges of blood pressure estimation via photoplethysmogram.

Mehta S, Kwatra N, Jain M, McDuff D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):18318.

PMID: 39112533 PMC: 11306225. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68862-1.


Wearable Data From Subjects Playing Super Mario, Taking University Exams, or Performing Physical Exercise Help Detect Acute Mood Disorder Episodes via Self-Supervised Learning: Prospective, Exploratory, Observational Study.

Corponi F, Li B, Anmella G, Valenzuela-Pascual C, Mas A, Pacchiarotti I JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024; 12:e55094.

PMID: 39018100 PMC: 11292167. DOI: 10.2196/55094.


Personalized Stress Detection Using Biosignals from Wearables: A Scoping Review.

Bolpagni M, Pardini S, Dianti M, Gabrielli S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(10).

PMID: 38794074 PMC: 11126007. DOI: 10.3390/s24103221.


Predicting stress in first-year college students using sleep data from wearable devices.

Bloomfield L, Fudolig M, Kim J, Llorin J, Lovato J, McGinnis E PLOS Digit Health. 2024; 3(4):e0000473.

PMID: 38602898 PMC: 11008774. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000473.


Advances in electrochemical biosensor design for the detection of the stress biomarker cortisol.

Weber C, Clay O, Lycan R, Anderson G, Simoska O Anal Bioanal Chem. 2023; 416(1):87-106.

PMID: 37989847 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-023-05047-1.


References
1.
Borarinsdottir H, Faurholt-Jepsen M, Ullum H, Frost M, Bardram J, Kessing L . The Validity of Daily Self-Assessed Perceived Stress Measured Using Smartphones in Healthy Individuals: Cohort Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(8):e13418. PMC: 6718079. DOI: 10.2196/13418. View

2.
Tawakol A, Ishai A, Takx R, Figueroa A, Ali A, Kaiser Y . Relation between resting amygdalar activity and cardiovascular events: a longitudinal and cohort study. Lancet. 2017; 389(10071):834-845. PMC: 7864285. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31714-7. View

3.
Arza A, Garzon-Rey J, Lazaro J, Gil E, Lopez-Anton R, de la Camara C . Measuring acute stress response through physiological signals: towards a quantitative assessment of stress. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2018; 57(1):271-287. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-018-1879-z. View

4.
Schuurmans A, de Looff P, Nijhof K, Rosada C, Scholte R, Popma A . Validity of the Empatica E4 Wristband to Measure Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Parameters: a Comparison to Electrocardiography (ECG). J Med Syst. 2020; 44(11):190. PMC: 7511462. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-020-01648-w. View

5.
Roshan D, Ferguson J, Pedlar C, Simpkin A, Wyns W, Sullivan F . A comparison of methods to generate adaptive reference ranges in longitudinal monitoring. PLoS One. 2021; 16(2):e0247338. PMC: 7894906. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247338. View