» Articles » PMID: 36362985

Evaluation of the Ecological Environment Affected by in Poplar

Overview
Journal Life (Basel)
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Nov 11
PMID 36362985
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

is a genus of globally significant plantation trees used widely in industrial and agricultural production. Poplars are easily damaged by and , resulting in decreasing quality. toxin-encoded by the gene has been widely adopted in poplar breeding because of its strong insect resistance. There is still no comprehensive and sufficient information about the effects of -modified (CM) poplars on the ecological environment. Here, we sampled the rhizosphere soils of field-grown CM and non-transgenic (NT) poplars and applied 16S rRNA and internal transcribed spacer amplicon Illumina MiSeq sequencing to determine the bacterial community associated with the CM and NT poplars. Based on the high-throughput sequencing of samples, we found that the predominant taxa included (about 40% of the total bacteria), (about 20% of the total bacteria), and (about 20% of the total bacteria) collected from the natural rhizosphere of NT and CM poplars. In addition, studies on the microbial diversity of poplar showed that expression has no significant influence on rhizosphere soil alkaline nitrogen, but significantly affects soil phosphorus, soil microbial biomass nitrogen, and carbon. The results exhibited a similar bacterial community structure between CM varieties affected by the expression of and non-transgenic poplars. In addition, expression revealed no significant influence on the composition of rhizosphere microbiomes. These results broadly reflect the effect of the toxin-encoded by on the ecology and environment and provide a clear path for researchers to continue research in this field in the future.

Citing Articles

Metagenomic Analysis of Rhizospheric Bacterial Community of Citrus Trees Expressing Phloem-Directed Antimicrobials.

Nunez-Munoz L, Sanchez-Garcia M, Calderon-Perez B, De la Torre-Almaraz R, Ruiz-Medrano R, Xoconostle-Cazares B Microb Ecol. 2024; 87(1):93.

PMID: 39008123 PMC: 11249458. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-024-02408-w.

References
1.
Zhou D, Xu L, Gao S, Guo J, Luo J, You Q . Cry1Ac Transgenic Sugarcane Does Not Affect the Diversity of Microbial Communities and Has No Significant Effect on Enzyme Activities in Rhizosphere Soil within One Crop Season. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:265. PMC: 4781841. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00265. View

2.
Liu M, Sui X, Hu Y, Feng F . Microbial community structure and the relationship with soil carbon and nitrogen in an original Korean pine forest of Changbai Mountain, China. BMC Microbiol. 2019; 19(1):218. PMC: 6743161. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-019-1584-6. View

3.
Zhang H, Hobbie E, Feng P, Niu L, Hu K . Can conservation agriculture mitigate climate change and reduce environmental impacts for intensive cropping systems in North China Plain?. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 806(Pt 3):151194. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151194. View

4.
Li P, Ye S, Liu H, Pan A, Ming F, Tang X . Cultivation of Drought-Tolerant and Insect-Resistant Rice Affects Soil Bacterial, but Not Fungal, Abundances and Community Structures. Front Microbiol. 2018; 9:1390. PMC: 6033987. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01390. View

5.
Gassmann A, Reisig D . Management of Insect Pests with Bt Crops in the United States. Annu Rev Entomol. 2022; 68:31-49. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120220-105502. View