» Articles » PMID: 36360992

Advancements in Monitoring Water Quality Based on Various Sensing Methods: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Nowadays, water pollution has become a global issue affecting most countries in the world. Water quality should be monitored to alert authorities on water pollution, so that action can be taken quickly. The objective of the review is to study various conventional and modern methods of monitoring water quality to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the methods. The methods include the Internet of Things (IoT), virtual sensing, cyber-physical system (CPS), and optical techniques. In this review, water quality monitoring systems and process control in several countries, such as New Zealand, China, Serbia, Bangladesh, Malaysia, and India, are discussed. Conventional and modern methods are compared in terms of parameters, complexity, and reliability. Recent methods of water quality monitoring techniques are also reviewed to study any loopholes in modern methods. We found that CPS is suitable for monitoring water quality due to a good combination of physical and computational algorithms. Its embedded sensors, processors, and actuators can be designed to detect and interact with environments. We believe that conventional methods are costly and complex, whereas modern methods are also expensive but simpler with real-time detection. Traditional approaches are more time-consuming and expensive due to the high maintenance of laboratory facilities, involve chemical materials, and are inefficient for on-site monitoring applications. Apart from that, previous monitoring methods have issues in achieving a reliable measurement of water quality parameters in real time. There are still limitations in instruments for detecting pollutants and producing valuable information on water quality. Thus, the review is important in order to compare previous methods and to improve current water quality assessments in terms of reliability and cost-effectiveness.

Citing Articles

Riverbank filtration: a frontline treatment method for surface and groundwater-African perspective.

Uwimpaye F, Twagirayezu G, Agbamu I, Mazurkiewicz K, Jez-Walkowiak J Environ Monit Assess. 2025; 197(2):160.

PMID: 39794612 PMC: 11723898. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-024-13413-4.


Toward a Predictive Understanding of Cyanobacterial Harmful Algal Blooms through AI Integration of Physical, Chemical, and Biological Data.

Marrone B, Banerjee S, Talapatra A, Gonzalez-Esquer C, Pilania G ACS ES T Water. 2024; 4(3):844-858.

PMID: 38482341 PMC: 10928721. DOI: 10.1021/acsestwater.3c00369.

References
1.
Pasika S, Gandla S . Smart water quality monitoring system with cost-effective using IoT. Heliyon. 2020; 6(7):e04096. PMC: 7334377. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04096. View

2.
Chang H, Hsu Y, Hung S, Ou G, Wu J, Hsu C . Autonomous Water Quality Monitoring and Water Surface Cleaning for Unmanned Surface Vehicle. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(4). PMC: 7914901. DOI: 10.3390/s21041102. View

3.
Zulkifli S, Rahim H, Lau W . Detection of contaminants in water supply: A review on state-of-the-art monitoring technologies and their applications. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2020; 255:2657-2689. PMC: 7126548. DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.09.078. View

4.
Wan Ismail W, Dawes J . Synthesis and Characterization of Silver-Gold Bimetallic Nanoparticles for Random Lasing. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022; 12(4). PMC: 8879745. DOI: 10.3390/nano12040607. View

5.
Shi Z, Chow C, Fabris R, Liu J, Jin B . Applications of Online UV-Vis Spectrophotometer for Drinking Water Quality Monitoring and Process Control: A Review. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(8). PMC: 9024714. DOI: 10.3390/s22082987. View