» Articles » PMID: 36360498

The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Gamiguibi-Tang Versus Hwangryunhaedok-Tang for Patients with Insomnia Disorder Based on a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2022 Nov 11
PMID 36360498
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

(1) Insomnia is associated with poor quality of life and loss of productivity, and is a significant economic burden on society. Gamiguibi-tang (GGBT) is the most frequently prescribed herbal medicine for insomnia treatment. Hwangryunhaedok-tang (HHT) is used as an insured herbal medicine for insomnia in the Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) system. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of GGBT versus HHT in patients with insomnia disorders based on clinical trial data; (2) Methods: The EuroQol five-dimension scale (EQ-5D) was used to estimate quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Direct and non-direct medical costs and lost productivity costs were estimated. The cost-effectiveness of GGBT was compared with HHT treatments over six weeks from a societal perspective; (3) Results: A total of 81 patients who underwent GGBT (n = 56) and HHT (n = 25) treatment completed the clinical trial. The EQ-5D score improved significantly more in the GGBT than in the HHT group (0.02 vs. −0.03, p < 0.05). The QALYs for six weeks were slightly greater in GGBT (0.0997) than in the HHT group (0.0987); however, the total costs incurred were approximately 9% less in GGBT ($934) than in the HHT group ($1029). GGBT was found to be a more economically dominant treatment option compared to HHT for treating insomnia; (4) Conclusions: Among herbal medicines, GGBT may be a cost-effective option for treating insomnia from a societal perspective in Korea.

Citing Articles

Effect of Herbal Medicine (Hwanglyeonhaedok-tang) on Insomnia Patients with Bedtime Procrastination: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Choi Y, Kim P, Park H, Jung S, Kwon O, Jung I J Pharmacopuncture. 2025; 27(4):322-331.

PMID: 39741568 PMC: 11656056. DOI: 10.3831/KPI.2024.27.4.322.


Content Comparison of Quality-of-Life Instruments Used in Economic Evaluations of Sleep Disorder Interventions: A Systematic Review.

Kaambwa B, Woods T, Natsky A, Bulamu N, Mpundu-Kaambwa C, Loffler K Pharmacoeconomics. 2024; 42(5):507-526.

PMID: 38340220 PMC: 11039546. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01349-5.

References
1.
Martin S, Aikens J, Chervin R . Toward cost-effectiveness analysis in the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia. Sleep Med Rev. 2004; 8(1):63-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2003.08.001. View

2.
Godet-Cayre V, Pelletier-Fleury N, Le Vaillant M, Dinet J, Massuel M, Leger D . Insomnia and absenteeism at work. Who pays the cost?. Sleep. 2006; 29(2):179-84. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/29.2.179. View

3.
Baka A, van der Zweerde T, Lancee J, Bosmans J, van Straten A . Cost-effectiveness of Guided Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Comparison with Care-as-Usual for Patients with Insomnia in General Practice. Behav Sleep Med. 2021; 20(2):188-203. DOI: 10.1080/15402002.2021.1901708. View

4.
Ait Abdellah S, Berlin A, Blondeau C, Guinobert I, Guilbot A, Beck M . A combination of Cham. and L. extracts for adjustment insomnia: A prospective observational study. J Tradit Complement Med. 2020; 10(2):116-123. PMC: 7109475. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2019.02.003. View

5.
Rosekind M, Gregory K . Insomnia risks and costs: health, safety, and quality of life. Am J Manag Care. 2010; 16(8):617-26. View