» Articles » PMID: 36360448

Body Composition Characteristics of Type 1 Diabetes Children and Adolescents: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study in Uganda

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2022 Nov 11
PMID 36360448
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Changes in body composition have been suggested as an intractable effect of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and its management. This study aims to compare body composition characteristics in a sample of young children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus with healthy controls. Methods: In this case−control study, body composition was assessed using bioelectrical impedance among 328 participants. Anthropometric measurements included weight, height, upper arm, hip, and waist, circumferences; biceps; triceps; and subscapular and suprailiac skinfolds. From raw Bioelectrical impedance data, we calculated the impedance, phase angle, and height normalised resistance and reactance to assess body composition. Analysis of variance accounting for paired blocks was used to compare the two matched groups, while an independent Student’s t-test was used for intragroup comparisons among cases. Results: Waist Hip Ratio, biceps, triceps, subscapular and suprailiac skinfolds were higher among cases than in controls. Cases showed a higher Fat Mass Index, higher fasting blood glucose and higher glycated haemoglobin. Cases also had a higher mean value of resistance (p = 0.0133), and a lower mean value of reactance (p = 0.0329). Phase angle was lower among cases than in controls (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our diabetic children showed higher levels of adiposity than controls. The observed differences in body composition are explained by differences in the fat-mass index. Abdominal fat accumulation was associated with poor glycaemic control and a lower phase angle.

Citing Articles

The Effects of Exercise Training on Body Composition and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Khalafi M, Dinizadeh F, Rosenkranz S, Symonds M, Fatolahi S Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(3).

PMID: 39942435 PMC: 11816365. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13030246.


Association of a Bioimpedance Profile with Optical Coherence Tomography Features in Diabetic Macular Edema.

Hwang S, Seong M, Kang M, Thng Z, Cho H, Shin Y J Clin Med. 2023; 12(20).

PMID: 37892814 PMC: 10607216. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12206676.


Advances in Research on Nutrition and Childhood Obesity.

Antonogeorgos G Children (Basel). 2023; 10(1).

PMID: 36670573 PMC: 9856500. DOI: 10.3390/children10010022.

References
1.
Cleland S, Fisher B, Colhoun H, Sattar N, Petrie J . Insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes: what is 'double diabetes' and what are the risks?. Diabetologia. 2013; 56(7):1462-70. PMC: 3671104. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-013-2904-2. View

2.
Marini E, Campa F, Buffa R, Stagi S, Matias C, Toselli S . Phase angle and bioelectrical impedance vector analysis in the evaluation of body composition in athletes. Clin Nutr. 2019; 39(2):447-454. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.02.016. View

3.
Jensen B, Moritoyo T, Kaufer-Horwitz M, Peine S, Norman K, Maisch M . Ethnic differences in fat and muscle mass and their implication for interpretation of bioelectrical impedance vector analysis. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018; 44(6):619-626. DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0276. View

4.
Liu L, Lawrence J, Davis C, Liese A, Pettitt D, Pihoker C . Prevalence of overweight and obesity in youth with diabetes in USA: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009; 11(1):4-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00519.x. View

5.
Fellinger P, Fuchs D, Wolf P, Heinze G, Luger A, Krebs M . Overweight and obesity in type 1 diabetes equal those of the general population. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019; 131(3-4):55-60. PMC: 6394663. DOI: 10.1007/s00508-018-1434-9. View