» Articles » PMID: 36359432

Comparative Study of DNA Extraction Methods for the PCR Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Nov 11
PMID 36359432
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stool samples typically contain PCR inhibitors; however, helminths are difficult to lyse and can cause false-negative PCR results. We assessed the effective methods for extracting DNA from different kinds of intestinal parasites. We compared the most common DNA extraction methods from stool samples, including the phenol-chloroform technique with or without a bead-beating step (P and PB), a QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Q), and a QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit (QB). Genomic DNA was extracted from 85 stool samples collected from patients infected with sp., hookworm, and . DNA quantity and DNA quality were evaluated via spectrophotometry, and DNA integrity was assessed by PCR. We found that P and PB provided higher DNA yields (~4 times) than when using Q and QB. However, P showed the lowest detection rate of PCR (8.2%), wherein only (7 out of 20 samples) was detected. QB showed the highest detection rate of PCR (61.2%). After plasmid spikes, only 5 samples by QB were negative while 60 samples by P were still negative. Remarkably, QB could extract DNA from all the groups of parasites that we tested. These results indicate that QB is the most effective DNA extraction method for the diagnosis and monitoring of intestinal parasites via PCR.

Citing Articles

Application of PCR-Based Techniques for the Identification of Genetic Fingerprint Diversity of Dominant Bacteria in Fecal Samples of Children with Diarrhea in Vietnam.

Nguyen T, Dao T, Nguyen H, Phung T, Pham T, Nguyen T Infect Dis Rep. 2024; 16(5):932-951.

PMID: 39452160 PMC: 11506915. DOI: 10.3390/idr16050075.


Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiota between Captive and Wild Long-Tailed Gorals for Ex Situ Conservation.

Park C, Jo Y, Jung D, Park H, Shin J Microorganisms. 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39065187 PMC: 11278867. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12071419.


Detection of Carbapenem Resistance Genes by qPCR: Choosing the Right Method for Total DNA Extraction.

Heller C, Bachmann I, Spiegel M, Hufert F, Dame G Microorganisms. 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39065054 PMC: 11278521. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12071285.


Transforming gastrointestinal helminth parasite identification in vertebrate hosts with metabarcoding: a systematic review.

Miller M, Rota C, Welsh A Parasit Vectors. 2024; 17(1):311.

PMID: 39030625 PMC: 11265005. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-024-06388-1.


A Two-Step Single Plex PCR Method for Evaluating Key Colonic Microbiota Markers in Young Mexicans with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Protocol and Pilot Epidemiological Application.

Herrera-Mejia J, Campos-Vega R, Wall-Medrano A, Jimenez-Vega F Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(14).

PMID: 37510132 PMC: 10377852. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13142387.

References
1.
Tan S, Yiap B . DNA, RNA, and protein extraction: the past and the present. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2009; 2009:574398. PMC: 2789530. DOI: 10.1155/2009/574398. View

2.
Burke R, McKenna J, Cox C, Coyle P, Shields M, Fairley D . A comparison of different pre-lysis methods and extraction kits for recovery of Streptococcus agalacticae (Lancefield group B Streptococcus) DNA from whole blood. J Microbiol Methods. 2016; 129:103-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.08.016. View

3.
Lorenz T . Polymerase chain reaction: basic protocol plus troubleshooting and optimization strategies. J Vis Exp. 2012; (63):e3998. PMC: 4846334. DOI: 10.3791/3998. View

4.
Sanprasert V, Kerdkaew R, Srirungruang S, Charuchaibovorn S, Phadungsaksawasdi K, Nuchprayoon S . Development of Conventional Multiplex PCR: A Rapid Technique for Simultaneous Detection of Soil-Transmitted Helminths. Pathogens. 2019; 8(3). PMC: 6789620. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens8030152. View

5.
Hart M, Meyer A, Johnson P, Ericsson A . Comparative Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods from Feces of Multiple Host Species for Downstream Next-Generation Sequencing. PLoS One. 2015; 10(11):e0143334. PMC: 4657925. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143334. View