» Articles » PMID: 36358410

Multiple Machine Learning Approaches for Morphometric Parameters in Prediction of Hydrocephalus

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Nov 11
PMID 36358410
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of hydrocephalus is mainly based on imaging findings. However, the significance of many imaging indicators may change, especially in some degenerative diseases, and even lead to misdiagnosis.

Methods: This study explored the effectiveness of commonly used morphological parameters and typical radiographic findings in hydrocephalus diagnosis. The patients' imaging data were divided into three groups, including the hydrocephalus group, the symptomatic group, and the normal control group. The diagnostic validity and weight of various parameters were compared between groups by multiple machine learning methods.

Results: Our results demonstrated that Evans' ratio is the most valuable diagnostic indicator compared to the hydrocephalus group and the normal control group. But frontal horns' ratio is more useful in diagnosing patients with symptoms. Meanwhile, the sign of disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space and third ventricle enlargement could be effective diagnostic indicators in all situations.

Conclusion: Both morphometric parameters and radiological features were essential in diagnosing hydrocephalus, but the weights are different in different situations. The machine learning approaches can be applied to optimize the diagnosis of other diseases and consistently update the clinical diagnostic criteria.

Citing Articles

Research priorities for non-invasive therapies to improve hydrocephalus outcomes.

Hochstetler A, Hehnly C, Dawes W, Harris D, Sadegh C, Mangano F Fluids Barriers CNS. 2025; 22(1):24.

PMID: 40033423 PMC: 11877769. DOI: 10.1186/s12987-025-00632-1.


A predictive model in patients with chronic hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study.

Rao D, Yang L, Enxi X, Siyuan L, Yu Q, Zheng L Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1366306.

PMID: 38817542 PMC: 11137279. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1366306.

References
1.
Kartal M, Ocakoglu G, Algin O . Feasibility of 3-dimensional sampling perfection with application optimized contrast sequence in the evaluation of patients with hydrocephalus. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015; 39(3):321-8. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000206. View

2.
Eide P . Intracranial pressure parameters in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients treated with ventriculo-peritoneal shunts. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005; 148(1):21-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-005-0654-8. View

3.
Pisapia J, Rozycki M, Akbari H, Bakas S, Thawani J, Moldenhauer J . Correlations of atrial diameter and frontooccipital horn ratio with ventricle size in fetal ventriculomegaly. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017; 19(3):300-306. DOI: 10.3171/2016.9.PEDS16210. View

4.
Zhuravlova I, Kornieieva M . Anatomic Variability of the Morphometric Parameters of the Third Ventricle of the Brain and Its Relations to the Shape of the Skull. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021; 82(Suppl 3):e315-e320. PMC: 8289542. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701527. View

5.
Filis A, Aghayev K, Vrionis F . Cerebrospinal Fluid and Hydrocephalus: Physiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Cancer Control. 2017; 24(1):6-8. DOI: 10.1177/107327481702400102. View