» Articles » PMID: 36356771

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater and Comparison to COVID-19 Cases in Two Sewersheds, North Carolina, USA

Abstract

Wastewater surveillance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may be useful for monitoring population-wide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections, especially given asymptomatic infections and limitations in diagnostic testing. We aimed to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater and compare viral concentrations to COVID-19 case numbers in the respective counties and sewersheds. Influent 24-hour composite wastewater samples were collected from July to December 2020 from two municipal wastewater treatment plants serving different population sizes in Orange and Chatham Counties in North Carolina. After a concentration step via HA filtration, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected and quantified by reverse transcription droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (RT-ddPCR) and quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), targeting the N1 and N2 nucleocapsid genes. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected by RT-ddPCR in 100 % (24/24) and 79 % (19/24) of influent wastewater samples from the larger and smaller plants, respectively. In comparison, viral RNA was detected by RT-qPCR in 41.7 % (10/24) and 8.3 % (2/24) of samples from the larger and smaller plants, respectively. Positivity rates and method agreement further increased for the RT-qPCR assay when samples with positive signals below the limit of detection were counted as positive. The wastewater data from the larger plant generally correlated (⍴ ~0.5, p < 0.05) with, and even anticipated, the trends in reported COVID-19 cases, with a notable spike in measured viral RNA preceding a spike in cases when students returned to a college campus in the Orange County sewershed. Correlations were generally higher when using estimates of sewershed-level case data rather than county-level data. This work supports use of wastewater surveillance for tracking COVID-19 disease trends, especially in identifying spikes in cases. Wastewater-based epidemiology can be a valuable resource for tracking disease trends, allocating resources, and evaluating policy in the fight against current and future pandemics.

Citing Articles

Estimating rates of change to interpret quantitative wastewater surveillance of disease trends.

Holcomb D, Christensen A, Hoffman K, Lee A, Blackwood A, Clerkin T Sci Total Environ. 2024; 951:175687.

PMID: 39173773 PMC: 11392626. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175687.


Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater from a shared septic system and sub-sewershed sites to expand COVID-19 disease surveillance.

Pasha A, Kotlarz N, Holcomb D, Reckling S, Kays J, Bailey E J Water Health. 2024; 22(6):978-992.

PMID: 38935450 DOI: 10.2166/wh.2024.303.


Current state and future perspectives on de facto population markers for normalization in wastewater-based epidemiology: A systematic literature review.

Boogaerts T, Van Wichelen N, Quireyns M, Burgard D, Bijlsma L, Delputte P Sci Total Environ. 2024; 935():173223.

PMID: 38761943 PMC: 11270913. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173223.


Characterizing Spatial Information Loss for Wastewater Surveillance Using crAssphage: Effect of Decay, Temperature, and Population Mobility.

Wiesner-Friedman C, Brinkman N, Wheaton E, Nagarkar M, Hart C, Keely S Environ Sci Technol. 2023; 57(49):20802-20812.

PMID: 38015885 PMC: 11479658. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c05587.


Use of Wastewater Metrics to Track COVID-19 in the US.

Varkila M, Montez-Rath M, Salomon J, Yu X, Block G, Owens D JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(7):e2325591.

PMID: 37494040 PMC: 10372707. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25591.


References
1.
Ciesielski M, Blackwood D, Clerkin T, Gonzalez R, Thompson H, Larson A . Assessing sensitivity and reproducibility of RT-ddPCR and RT-qPCR for the quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater. J Virol Methods. 2021; 297:114230. PMC: 8267102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114230. View

2.
Wu F, Zhang J, Xiao A, Gu X, Lee W, Armas F . SARS-CoV-2 Titers in Wastewater Are Higher than Expected from Clinically Confirmed Cases. mSystems. 2020; 5(4). PMC: 7566278. DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00614-20. View

3.
Nolan T, Hands R, Ogunkolade W, Bustin S . SPUD: a quantitative PCR assay for the detection of inhibitors in nucleic acid preparations. Anal Biochem. 2006; 351(2):308-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.01.051. View

4.
Racki N, Dreo T, Gutierrez-Aguirre I, Blejec A, Ravnikar M . Reverse transcriptase droplet digital PCR shows high resilience to PCR inhibitors from plant, soil and water samples. Plant Methods. 2015; 10(1):42. PMC: 4307183. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-014-0042-6. View

5.
Nathanson N, Kew O . From emergence to eradication: the epidemiology of poliomyelitis deconstructed. Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 172(11):1213-29. PMC: 2991634. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq320. View