» Articles » PMID: 36355824

Specific Incremental Test for Aerobic Fitness in Trail Running: IncremenTrail

Overview
Journal Sports (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Nov 10
PMID 36355824
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Trail running (TR) is performed in a natural environment, including various ranges of slopes where maximal oxygen consumption is a major contributor to performance. The aim of this study is to investigate the validity of tests performed in uphill conditions named the "IncremenTrail" (IncT), based on the incremental ascending speed (AS) to evaluate trail runners' cardiorespiratory parameters. IncT protocol included a constant gradient slope set at 25% during the whole test; the starting speed was 500 m·h (25% slope and 2.06 km·h) and increased by 100 m·h every minute (0.41 km·h). Twenty trail runner specialists performed the IncT and a supramaximal exercise bout to exhaustion with intensity set at 105% of maximal AS (Tlim). Oxygen consumption, breathing frequency, ventilation, respiratory exchange ratio (RER), and heart rate were continuously recorded during the exercises. The blood lactate concentration and rate of perceived exertion were collected at the end of the exercises. During the IncT test, 16 athletes (80%) reached a plateau of maximal oxygen uptake (65.5 ± 7.6 mL·kg·min), 19 athletes (95%) reached RER values over 1.10 (1.12 ± 0.02) and all the athletes achieved blood lactate concentration over 8.0 mmol·L (17.1 ± 3.5 mmol·L) and a maximal heart rate ≥90% of the theoretical maximum (185 ± 11 bpm). Maximal values were not significantly different between IncT and Tlim. In addition, ventilatory thresholds could be determined for all runners with an associated AS. IncT provided a suitable protocol to evaluate trail runners' cardiorespiratory limitations and allowed us to obtain specific intensities based on the ascending speed useful for training purposes in specific conditions.

Citing Articles

Running Economy in the Vertical Kilometer.

Bascuas P, Gutierrez H, Piedrafita E, Rabal-Pelay J, Berzosa C, Bataller-Cervero A Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(23).

PMID: 38067721 PMC: 10708873. DOI: 10.3390/s23239349.

References
1.
Van Hooren B, Fuller J, Buckley J, Miller J, Sewell K, Rao G . Is Motorized Treadmill Running Biomechanically Comparable to Overground Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Over Studies. Sports Med. 2019; 50(4):785-813. PMC: 7069922. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-019-01237-z. View

2.
Vernillo G, Giandolini M, Edwards W, Morin J, Samozino P, Horvais N . Biomechanics and Physiology of Uphill and Downhill Running. Sports Med. 2016; 47(4):615-629. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-016-0605-y. View

3.
Fornasiero A, Savoldelli A, Fruet D, Boccia G, Pellegrini B, Schena F . Physiological intensity profile, exercise load and performance predictors of a 65-km mountain ultra-marathon. J Sports Sci. 2017; 36(11):1287-1295. DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1374707. View

4.
Poole D, Jones A . Measurement of the maximum oxygen uptake V̇o: V̇o is no longer acceptable. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017; 122(4):997-1002. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01063.2016. View

5.
Poole D, Wilkerson D, Jones A . Validity of criteria for establishing maximal O2 uptake during ramp exercise tests. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007; 102(4):403-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0596-3. View