» Articles » PMID: 36353693

Effect of Health Literacy and Shared Decision-making on Choice of Weight-loss Plan Among Overweight or Obese Participants Receiving a Prototype Artificial Intelligence Robot Intervention Facilitating Weight-loss Management Decisions

Overview
Journal Digit Health
Date 2022 Nov 10
PMID 36353693
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical decision-making is still in early development. We developed an AI robot intervention prototype with a health literacy-friendly interface that uses interactive voice response (IVR) surveying to assist in decision-making for weight loss. The weight-specific health literacy instrument (WSHLI) and Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDMQ) were used to measure factors influencing weight-loss decisions. Factors associated with participants choosing to lose weight were analyzed using logistic regression, and factors influencing the selection of specific weight-loss plans were examined with one-way analysis of variance. Our study recruited 144 overweight or obese adults (69.4% women, 58.3% with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24). After interacting with the AI robot, 78% of the study population made the decision to lose weight. SDMQ score was a significant factor positively influencing the decision for weight-loss (odds ratio [OR]: 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-4.29,  = 0.027). Individuals who selected self-monitored lifestyle modification (mean ± SD: 11.52 ± 1.95) had significantly higher health literacy than those who selected dietician-assisted plan (9.92 ± 2.30) and physician-guided treatment (9.60 ± 1.52) (both  = 0.001). The study results demonstrated that our prototype AI robot can effectively encourage individuals to make decisions regarding weight management and that both WSHLI and SDMQ scores affect the choice of weight-loss plans.

Citing Articles

Assessing online chat-based artificial intelligence models for weight loss recommendation appropriateness and bias in the presence of guideline incongruence.

Annor E, Atarere J, Ubah N, Jolaoye O, Kunkle B, Egbo O Int J Obes (Lond). 2025; .

PMID: 39871015 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-025-01717-5.


Factors influencing health literacy in overweight management among late adolescents in Thailand: A cross-sectional study.

Narmkul P, Woradet S, Armartpundit T, Maninet S, Songserm N Belitung Nurs J. 2024; 10(5):563-570.

PMID: 39416350 PMC: 11474267. DOI: 10.33546/bnj.3476.


Artificial intelligence and obesity management: An Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) 2023.

Bays H, Fitch A, Cuda S, Gonsahn-Bollie S, Rickey E, Hablutzel J Obes Pillars. 2023; 6:100065.

PMID: 37990659 PMC: 10662105. DOI: 10.1016/j.obpill.2023.100065.

References
1.
Hales C, Carroll M, Fryar C, Ogden C . Prevalence of Obesity and Severe Obesity Among Adults: United States, 2017-2018. NCHS Data Brief. 2020; (360):1-8. View

2.
U S Department Of Health And Human Services . Opioid abuse in the United States and Department of Health and Human Services actions to address opioid-drug-related overdoses and deaths. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2015; 29(2):133-9. DOI: 10.3109/15360288.2015.1037530. View

3.
Marshall T, Champagne-Langabeer T, Castelli D, Hoelscher D . Cognitive computing and eScience in health and life science research: artificial intelligence and obesity intervention programs. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2017; 5(1):13. PMC: 5665754. DOI: 10.1007/s13755-017-0030-0. View

4.
Tsai T, Lee S . Development and validation of a Weight-Specific Health Literacy Instrument (WSHLI). Obes Res Clin Pract. 2017; 12(2):214-221. DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2017.11.003. View

5.
Berkman N, Sheridan S, Donahue K, Halpern D, Crotty K . Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(2):97-107. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005. View