» Articles » PMID: 36353526

Longitudinal Association Between Informal Unpaid Caregiving and Mental Health Amongst Working Age Adults in High-income OECD Countries: A Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Nov 10
PMID 36353526
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Informal unpaid caregivers provide most of the world's care needs, experiencing numerous health and wealth penalties as a result. As the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted, informal care is highly gendered. Longitudinal evidence is needed to assess the causal effect of caregiving on mental health. This review addresses a gap by summarising and appraising the longitudinal evidence examining the association between unpaid caregiving and mental health among working age adults in high-income Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries and examining gender differences.

Methods: Six databases were searched (Medline, PsycInfo, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Econlit) from Jan 1, 2000 to April 1, 2022. Population-based, peer-reviewed quantitative studies using any observational design were included. Population of interest was working age adults. Exposure was any unpaid caregiving, and studies must have had a non-caregiving comparator for inclusion. Mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, psychological distress/wellbeing) were measurable by validated self-report tools or professional diagnosis. Screening, data extraction and quality assessment (ROBINS-E) were conducted by two reviewers. The study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022312401).

Findings: Of the 4536 records screened; 13 eligible studies (133,426 participants) were included. Overall quality of evidence was moderate. Significant between-study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis, so albatross and effect-direction plots complement the narrative synthesis. Results indicate a negative association between informal unpaid care and mental health in adults of working age. Importantly, all included studies were longitudinal in design. Where studies were stratified by gender, caregiving had a consistently negative impact on the mental health of women. Few studies examined men but revealed a negative effect where an association was found.

Interpretation: Our review highlights the need to mitigate the mental health risks of caregiving in working age adults. Whilst men need to be included in further scholarship, reducing the disproportionate caregiving load on women is a crucial requirement for policy development.

Funding: Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Targeted Research Support Grant.

Citing Articles

Mental and Physical Wellbeing of Carer-Employees in Canada.

Peng I Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 21(12.

PMID: 39767452 PMC: 11675741. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21121611.


Caregiving in Asia: Priority areas for research, policy, and practice to support family caregivers.

Jiang N, Wu B, Li Y Health Care Sci. 2024; 3(6):374-382.

PMID: 39735283 PMC: 11671212. DOI: 10.1002/hcs2.124.


Psychological Well-being Interactively Affected by Long Working Hours and Caregiving Activities.

Park M, Lee J Saf Health Work. 2024; 15(4):458-463.

PMID: 39697316 PMC: 11650789. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2024.10.006.


The roles of employment status and income in the mental health of informal caregivers in Germany.

Scheuermann J, Pendergrass A, Diehl K, Herr R BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2802.

PMID: 39396955 PMC: 11472450. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20252-y.


The prevalence, characteristics, and psychological wellbeing of unpaid carers in the United Kingdom.

Redican E, Meade R, Harrison C, McBride O, Butter S, Murphy J Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39126515 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-024-02745-8.


References
1.
Stratmann M, Forsell Y, Moller J, Liang Y . Informal care and the impact on depression and anxiety among Swedish adults: a population-based cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):1263. PMC: 8243546. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11246-1. View

2.
OReilly D, Connolly S, Rosato M, Patterson C . Is caring associated with an increased risk of mortality? A longitudinal study. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 67(8):1282-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.025. View

3.
Mortenson W, Demers L, Fuhrer M, Jutai J, Lenker J, DeRuyter F . How assistive technology use by individuals with disabilities impacts their caregivers: a systematic review of the research evidence. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 91(11):984-98. PMC: 5668128. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318269eceb. View

4.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

5.
Pinquart M, Sorensen S . Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2003; 18(2):250-67. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.250. View