» Articles » PMID: 36353251

Gender Differences in Cervical Spine Motions and Loads With Head Supported Mass Using Finite Element Models

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While many studies have been conducted to delineate the role of gender in rear impact via experiments, clinical investigations, modeling, and epidemiological research, the effect of the added head mass on segmental motions has received less attention. The objective of the study is to determine the role of the head supported mass on the segmental motions and loads on the cervical spinal column from rear impact loading. The study used finite element modeling. The model was subjected to mesh convergence studies. It was validated with human cadaver experimental data by applying the rear impact acceleration pulse to the base of the spine. At all levels of the subaxial spinal column, a comparison was made between male and female spines and with and without the use of an army combat helmet. For this purpose, segmental motions, forces, and bending moments were used as biomechanical parameters. Results showed that female spines responded with increased motions than males, and the presence of a helmet increased motions and loads in males and female spines at all levels. Numerical data are given. Head supported mass affects spine responses at all levels. The present computational modeling study, from one geometry for the male spine and one geometry for the female spine (limitations are addressed in the paper), provided insights into the mechanisms of the internal load transfer with the presence of head supported mass, prevalent in certain civilian occupations and active-duty Service members in the military.

Citing Articles

Effect of Osteoporosis on Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Following One-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Hong C, Nam W, Lee Y, Lee D Asian Spine J. 2024; 18(2):182-189.

PMID: 38454751 PMC: 11065514. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2023.0207.


Comparison of biomechanical parameters of two Chinese cervical spine rotation manipulations based on motion capture and finite element analysis.

Lin D, He Z, Weng R, Zhu Y, Lin Z, Deng Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1195583.

PMID: 37576989 PMC: 10415076. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1195583.


The Influence of Mobile Device Type on Camera-Based Monitoring of Neck Movements for Cervical Rehabilitation.

Roig-Maimo M, Salinas-Bueno I, Mas-Sanso R, Varona J, Martinez-Bueso P Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(5).

PMID: 36904689 PMC: 10007212. DOI: 10.3390/s23052482.

References
1.
Reilly D, Burstein A . The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech. 1975; 8(6):393-405. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(75)90075-5. View

2.
Osth J, Mendoza-Vazquez M, Sato F, Svensson M, Linder A, Brolin K . A female head-neck model for rear impact simulations. J Biomech. 2016; 51:49-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.066. View

3.
Iatridis J, Setton L, Foster R, Rawlins B, Weidenbaum M, Mow V . Degeneration affects the anisotropic and nonlinear behaviors of human anulus fibrosus in compression. J Biomech. 1998; 31(6):535-44. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00046-3. View

4.
Katz P, Reynolds H, Foust D, Baum J . Mid-sagittal dimensions of cervical vertebral bodies. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1975; 43(3):319-26. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330430304. View

5.
Holzapfel G, Schulze-Bauer C, Feigl G, Regitnig P . Single lamellar mechanics of the human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2005; 3(3):125-40. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-004-0053-8. View