» Articles » PMID: 36351884

Evaluating Implementation and Outcomes of the Achieving Depression and Anxiety Patient-Centered Treatment Collaborative Care Program in a Large, Integrated Health Care System: A Mixed Methods Observational Study Protocol

Overview
Journal Perm J
Date 2022 Nov 9
PMID 36351884
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background Collaborative care is an evidence-based multidisciplinary model shown to improve patient depression and anxiety outcomes. Although there is robust literature showing the effectiveness of collaborative care on depression and anxiety symptoms, there is little published on outcomes of collaborative care implementation or the efficacy of collaborative care compared with psychiatric referrals. Reported here is a study protocol examining a novel depression and anxiety collaborative care program in a large, integrated health care system. Methods This is a mixed methods study of the Achieving Depression and Anxiety Patient-Centered Treatment (ADAPT) program as compared to outpatient psychiatric care at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a large, integrated health care delivery system. The ADAPT program was designed using collaborative care principles, including measurement-based care, accurate diagnosis, and population management. Eligible participants will be ≥ 18 years old with mild to moderate-severe depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Exclusion criteria include acute suicide risk and serious mental health comorbidities. Implementation is examined using the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework and interviews with program stakeholders. Results Pending. Conclusion Study data will help inform future collaborative care efforts while expanding the literature base. The Achieving Depression and Anxiety Patient-Centered Treatment program may improve patient outcomes and access to quality depression and/or anxiety care.

Citing Articles

Telehealth Collaborative Care Led by Clinical Pharmacists for People With Psychosis or Bipolar Disorder: A Propensity Weighted Comparison With Usual Psychiatric Care.

Iturralde E, Fazzolari L, Slama N, Alexeeff S, Sterling S, Awsare S J Clin Psychiatry. 2024; 85(1).

PMID: 38301189 PMC: 10868914. DOI: 10.4088/JCP.23m14917.

References
1.
Pincus H, Hough L, Houtsinger J, Rollman B, Frank R . Emerging models of depression care: multi-level ('6 P') strategies. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2003; 12(1):54-63. PMC: 6878316. DOI: 10.1002/mpr.142. View

2.
Luber M, Meyers B, Hollenberg J, DiDomenico T, Charlson M, Alexopoulos G . Depression and service utilization in elderly primary care patients. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001; 9(2):169-76. View

3.
Plummer F, Manea L, Trepel D, McMillan D . Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016; 39:24-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.11.005. View

4.
Simpson W, Glazer M, Michalski N, Steiner M, Frey B . Comparative efficacy of the generalized anxiety disorder 7-item scale and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as screening tools for generalized anxiety disorder in pregnancy and the postpartum period. Can J Psychiatry. 2014; 59(8):434-40. PMC: 4143300. DOI: 10.1177/070674371405900806. View

5.
Katon W, Unutzer J, Wells K, Jones L . Collaborative depression care: history, evolution and ways to enhance dissemination and sustainability. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010; 32(5):456-64. PMC: 3810032. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.04.001. View