» Articles » PMID: 36351688

Impact of Radiographer Immediate Reporting of X-rays of the Chest from General Practice on the Lung Cancer Pathway (radioX): a Randomised Controlled Trial

Abstract

Method: People referred for CXR from primary care to a single acute district general hospital in London attended sessions that were prerandomised to either immediate radiographer (IR) reporting or standard radiographer (SR) reporting within 24 hours. CXRs were subsequently reported by radiologists blind to the radiographer reports to test the reliability of the radiographer report. Radiographer and local radiologist discordant cases were reviewed by thoracic radiologists, blinded to reporter.

Results: 8682 CXRs were performed between 21 June 2017 and 4 August 2018, 4096 (47.2%) for IR and 4586 (52.8%) for SR. Lung cancer was diagnosed in 49, with 27 (55.1%) for IR. The median time from CXR to diagnosis of lung cancer for IR was 32 days (IQR 19, 70) compared with 63 days (IQR 29, 78) for SR (p=0.03).8258 CXRs (95.1%) were reported by both radiographers and local radiologists. In the 1361 (16.5%) with discordance, the reviewing thoracic radiologists were equally likely to agree with local radiologist and radiographer reports.

Conclusions: Immediate reporting of CXRs from primary care reduces time to diagnosis of lung cancer by half, likely due to rapid progress to CT. Radiographer reports are comparable to local radiologist reports for accuracy.

Trial Registration: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN21818068. Registered on 20 June 2017.

Citing Articles

Artificial intelligence software for analysing chest X-ray images to identify suspected lung cancer: an evidence synthesis early value assessment.

Colquitt J, Jordan M, Court R, Loveman E, Parr J, Ghosh I Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(50):1-75.

PMID: 39254229 PMC: 11403378. DOI: 10.3310/LKRT4721.

References
1.
Torring M, Falborg A, Jensen H, Neal R, Weller D, Reguilon I . Advanced-stage cancer and time to diagnosis: An International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) cross-sectional study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019; 28(5):e13100. DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13100. View

2.
Navani N, Nankivell M, Lawrence D, Lock S, Makker H, Baldwin D . Lung cancer diagnosis and staging with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration compared with conventional approaches: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2015; 3(4):282-9. PMC: 4648022. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00029-6. View

3.
Evison M, Hewitt K, Lyons J, Crosbie P, Balata H, Gee C . Implementation and outcomes of the RAPID programme: Addressing the front end of the lung cancer pathway in Manchester. Clin Med (Lond). 2020; 20(4):401-405. PMC: 7385808. DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0218. View

4.
McNEMAR Q . Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika. 2010; 12(2):153-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02295996. View

5.
Ellis P, Vandermeer R . Delays in the diagnosis of lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2012; 3(3):183-8. PMC: 3256519. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2011.01.01. View