» Articles » PMID: 36346050

Final 5-Year Report of the Randomized BIO-RESORT Trial Comparing 3 Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in All-Comers

Abstract

Background In a previous trial, higher 5-year mortality was observed following treatment with biodegradable polymer Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). We assessed 5-year safety and efficacy of all-comers as well as patients with diabetes treated with SES or Synergy everolimus-eluting stents (EES) versus durable polymer Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES). Methods and Results The randomized BIO-RESORT (Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer and Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in an All Comers Population) trial enrolled 3514 all-comer patients at 4 Dutch cardiac centers. Patients aged ≥18 years who required percutaneous coronary intervention were eligible. Participants were stratified for diabetes and randomized to treatment with SES, EES, or ZES (1:1:1). The main end point was target vessel failure (cardiac mortality, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Five-year follow-up was available in 3183 of 3514 (90.6%) patients. The main end point target vessel failure occurred in 142 of 1169 (12.7%) patients treated with SES, 130 of 1172 (11.6%) treated with EES, versus 157 of 1173 (14.1%) treated with ZES (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.71-1.12], =0.31; and HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65-1.04], =0.10, respectively). Individual components of target vessel failure showed no significant between-stent difference. Very late definite stent thrombosis rates were low and similar (SES, 1.1%; EES, 0.6%; ZES, 0.9%). In patients with diabetes, target vessel failure did not differ significantly between stent-groups (SES, 19.8%; EES, 19.2%; versus ZES, 21.1% [=0.69 and =0.63]). Conclusions Orsiro SES, Synergy EES, and Resolute Integrity ZES showed similar 5-year outcomes of safety and efficacy, including mortality. A prespecified stent comparison in patients with diabetes also revealed no significant differences in 5-year clinical outcomes. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01674803.

Citing Articles

Elderly patients treated with Onyx versus Orsiro drug-eluting coronary stents in a randomized clinical trial with long-term follow-up.

van Vliet D, Ploumen E, Pinxterhuis T, Doggen C, Aminian A, Schotborgh C Clin Res Cardiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40035811 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-025-02622-7.


Durable versus biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents in all-comers.

Witzig T, Puricel S, Witzig A, Meier P, Arroyo D, Togni M Open Heart. 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 40032607 PMC: 11877205. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-003104.


Long-term outcomes following ultrathin vs thin-strut drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Yasmin F, Zaidi S, Moeed A, Khan M, Ali E, Asghar M Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2024; 14(5):267-280.

PMID: 39583995 PMC: 11578867. DOI: 10.62347/UCLC9729.


Comparison of Ridaforolimus-Eluting and Zotarolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: 5-Year Outcomes From the BIONICS and NIREUS Trials.

Zornitzki L, Smits P, Love M, Stone G, Kandzari D, Redfors B J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(22):e036210.

PMID: 39547969 PMC: 11681401. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036210.


Clinical Impact of Intracoronary Imaging in the Management of Stent Thrombosis.

Karamasis G, Katsikis A, Konstantinou K, Clesham G, Kelly P, Jagathesan R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200809 PMC: 11355795. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164667.


References
1.
Ploumen E, Buiten R, Zocca P, Doggen C, Jessurun G, Schotborgh C . Acute myocardial infarction treated with novel Resolute Onyx and Orsiro stents in the randomized BIONYX trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 98(2):E188-E196. PMC: 8451772. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29594. View

2.
von Birgelen C, Kok M, van der Heijden L, Danse P, Schotborgh C, Scholte M . Very thin strut biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents in allcomers with coronary artery disease (BIO-RESORT): a three-arm, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016; 388(10060):2607-2617. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31920-1. View

3.
Iglesias J, Heg D, Roffi M, Tuller D, Lanz J, Rigamonti F . Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019; 8(22):e013607. PMC: 6915288. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013607. View

4.
Wijns W, Valdes-Chavarri M, Richardt G, Moreno R, Iniguez-Romo A, Barbato E . Long-term clinical outcomes after bioresorbable and permanent polymer drug-eluting stent implantation: final five-year results of the CENTURY II randomised clinical trial. EuroIntervention. 2018; 14(3):e343-e351. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00358. View

5.
Kereiakes D, Windecker S, Jobe R, Mehta S, Sarembock I, Feldman R . Clinical Outcomes Following Implantation of Thin-Strut, Bioabsorbable Polymer-Coated, Everolimus-Eluting SYNERGY Stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12(9):e008152. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008152. View