Relationship of Loudness-dependent Auditory Evoked Potentials with Change-related Cortical Responses

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2022 Nov 7

PMID 36342917

Authors

Kohei Fujita

Nobuyuki Takeuchi

Shunsuke Sugiyama

Koji Inui

Yuki Fujita

Ami Yamaba

Taeko Kamiya

Kousuke Kanemoto

Makoto Nishihara

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that change-related cortical responses are phenomena similar to the onset response and could be applied to the loudness dependence of auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) paradigm. In the present study, we examined the relationship between LDAEP and the change-related response using electroencephalography findings in 50 healthy subjects. There were five conditions (55, 65, 75, 85, and 95 dB) for LDAEP and five similar conditions (abrupt sound pressure increase from 70 to 75, 80, 85, 90, and 95 dB) for the change-related response. Both the onset and abrupt sound pressure increase evoked a triphasic response with peaks at approximately 50 (P50), 100 (N100), and 200 (P200) ms. We calculated the peak-to-peak amplitudes for P50/N100 and N100/P200. Medians and slopes for P50/N100 and N100/P200 amplitudes were calculated and compared between the two measures. Results revealed a significant correlation for both the slope and median for P50/N100 (r = 0.36, 0.37, p = 1.0 × 10-2, 7.9 × 10-3), N100/P200 (r = 0.40, 0.34, p = 4.0 × 10-3, 1.6 × 10-2), and P50/N100/P200 (r = 0.36, 0.35, p = 1.0 × 10-2, 1.3 × 10-2). These results suggested that the change-related response and LDAEP shared generation mechanisms at least partially.

Citing Articles

Individualized Closed-Loop Acoustic Stimulation Suggests an Alpha Phase Dependence of Sound Evoked and Induced Brain Activity Measured with EEG Recordings.

Harlow T, Marquez S, Bressler S, Read H eNeuro. 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38834300 PMC: 11181104. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0511-23.2024.

References

Kenemans J, Kahkonen S . How human electrophysiology informs psychopharmacology: from bottom-up driven processing to top-down control. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010; 36(1):26-51. PMC: 3055493. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2010.157. View

Nishihara M, Inui K, Morita T, Kodaira M, Mochizuki H, Otsuru N . Echoic memory: investigation of its temporal resolution by auditory offset cortical responses. PLoS One. 2014; 9(8):e106553. PMC: 4149571. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106553. View

Juckel G, Hegerl U, Molnar M, Csepe V, Karmos G . Auditory evoked potentials reflect serotonergic neuronal activity--a study in behaving cats administered drugs acting on 5-HT1A autoreceptors in the dorsal raphe nucleus. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2000; 21(6):710-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0893-133X(99)00074-3. View

Urakawa T, Inui K, Yamashiro K, Tanaka E, Kakigi R . Cortical dynamics of visual change detection based on sensory memory. Neuroimage. 2010; 52(1):302-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.071. View

Jaworska N, Blondeau C, Tessier P, Norris S, Fusee W, Blier P . Response prediction to antidepressants using scalp and source-localized loudness dependence of auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) slopes. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013; 44:100-7. PMC: 3654010. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.01.012. View

Wutzler A, Winter C, Kitzrow W, Uhl I, Wolf R, Heinz A . Loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials as indicator of central serotonergic neurotransmission: simultaneous electrophysiological recordings and in vivo microdialysis in the rat primary auditory cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008; 33(13):3176-81. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2008.42. View

Rapin I, Schimmel H, Tourk L, Krasnegor N, Pollak C . Evoked responses to clicks and tones of varying intensity in waking adults. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1966; 21(4):335-44. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(66)90039-3. View

Gallinat J, Bottlender R, Juckel G, Stotz G, Kuss H, Mavrogiorgou P . The loudness dependency of the auditory evoked N1/P2-component as a predictor of the acute SSRI response in depression. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000; 148(4):404-11. DOI: 10.1007/s002130050070. View

Zheng Y, Liu L, Li R, Wu Z, Chen L, Li J . Impaired interaural correlation processing in people with schizophrenia. Eur J Neurosci. 2021; 54(7):6646-6662. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15449. View

10.

Alain C, Chow R, Lu J, Rabi R, Sharma V, Shen D . Aging Enhances Neural Activity in Auditory, Visual, and Somatosensory Cortices: The Common Cause Revisited. J Neurosci. 2021; 42(2):264-275. PMC: 8802933. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0864-21.2021. View

11.

Park Y, Kim D, Kim S, Im C, Lee S . The loudness dependence of the auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) as a predictor of the response to escitalopram in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010; 213(2-3):625-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-010-2061-y. View

12.

Takeuchi N, Kinukawa T, Sugiyama S, Inui K, Nishihara M . Test-retest reliability of prepulse inhibition paradigm using auditory evoked potentials. Neurosci Res. 2020; 170:187-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2020.08.011. View

13.

Conti F, Minelli A, Debiasi S, Melone M . Neuronal and glial localization of NMDA receptors in the cerebral cortex. Mol Neurobiol. 1997; 14(1-2):1-18. DOI: 10.1007/BF02740618. View

14.

Inui K, Urakawa T, Yamashiro K, Otsuru N, Nishihara M, Takeshima Y . Non-linear laws of echoic memory and auditory change detection in humans. BMC Neurosci. 2010; 11:80. PMC: 2904354. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-11-80. View

15.

De Lugt D, Loewy D, Campbell K . The effect of sleep onset on event related potentials with rapid rates of stimulus presentation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996; 98(6):484-92. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(96)94726-4. View

16.

Uhl I, Krumova E, Regeniter S, Bar K, Norra C, Richter H . Association between wind-up ratio and central serotonergic function in healthy subjects and depressed patients. Neurosci Lett. 2011; 504(2):176-180. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.09.033. View

17.

Fujii S, Motomura E, Inui K, Watanabe T, Hakumoto Y, Higuchi K . Weaker prepulse exerts stronger suppression of a change-detecting neural circuit. Neurosci Res. 2020; 170:195-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2020.07.007. View

18.

Ohoyama K, Motomura E, Inui K, Nishihara M, Otsuru N, Oi M . Memory-based pre-attentive auditory N1 elicited by sound movement. Neurosci Res. 2012; 73(3):248-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2012.04.003. View

19.

Yamashiro K, Inui K, Otsuru N, Kida T, Kakigi R . Automatic auditory off-response in humans: an MEG study. Eur J Neurosci. 2009; 30(1):125-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06790.x. View

20.

Ambrosini A, Kisialiou A, Coppola G, Finos L, Magis D, Pierelli F . Visual and auditory cortical evoked potentials in interictal episodic migraine: An audit on 624 patients from three centres. Cephalalgia. 2016; 37(12):1126-1134. DOI: 10.1177/0333102416665224. View