» Articles » PMID: 36341272

Prediction of Radiographic Progression Pattern in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Using Group-based Trajectory Modeling and Decision Trees

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Nov 7
PMID 36341272
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to identify trajectories of radiographic progression of the spine over time and use them, along with associated clinical factors, to develop a prediction model for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods: Data from the medical records of patients diagnosed with AS in a single center were extracted between 2001 and 2018. Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Scores (mSASSS) were estimated from cervical and lumbar radiographs. Group-based trajectory modeling classified patients into trajectory subgroups using longitudinal mSASSS data. In multivariate analysis, significant clinical factors associated with trajectories were selected and used to develop a decision tree for prediction of radiographic progression. The most appropriate group for each patient was then predicted using decision tree analysis.

Results: We identified three trajectory classes: class 1 had a uniformly increasing slope of mSASSS, class 2 showed sustained low mSASSS, and class 3 showed little change in the slope of mSASSS but highest mSASSS from time of diagnosis to after progression. In multivariate analysis for predictive factors, female sex, younger age at diagnosis, lack of eye involvement, presence of peripheral joint involvement, and low baseline erythrocyte sedimentation rate (log) were significantly associated with class 2. Class 3 was significantly associated with male sex, older age at diagnosis, presence of ocular involvement, and lack of peripheral joint involvement when compared with class 1. Six clinical factors from multivariate analysis were used for the decision tree for classifying patients into three trajectories of radiographic progression.

Conclusion: We identified three patterns of radiographic progression over time and developed a decision tree based on clinical factors to classify patients according to their trajectories of radiographic progression. Clinically, this model holds promise for predicting prognosis in patients with AS.

Citing Articles

Axial Imaging in Spondyloarthritis.

Mohan V, Hwang M Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2024; 50(4):581-602.

PMID: 39415369 PMC: 11493334. DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2024.07.002.


Biomechanics in the onset and severity of spondyloarthritis: a force to be reckoned with.

Iyer P, Hwang M, Ridley L, Weisman M RMD Open. 2023; 9(4).

PMID: 37949613 PMC: 10649803. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003372.

References
1.
Poddubnyy D, Listing J, Haibel H, Knuppel S, Rudwaleit M, Sieper J . Functional relevance of radiographic spinal progression in axial spondyloarthritis: results from the GErman SPondyloarthritis Inception Cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018; 57(4):703-711. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex475. View

2.
van der Heijde D, Braun J, Deodhar A, Baraliakos X, Landewe R, Richards H . Modified stoke ankylosing spondylitis spinal score as an outcome measure to assess the impact of treatment on structural progression in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018; 58(3):388-400. PMC: 6381766. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key128. View

3.
Ward M, Weisman M, Davis Jr J, Reveille J . Risk factors for functional limitations in patients with long-standing ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005; 53(5):710-7. PMC: 2530902. DOI: 10.1002/art.21444. View

4.
Doran M, Brophy S, MacKay K, Taylor G, Calin A . Predictors of longterm outcome in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2003; 30(2):316-20. View

5.
Vermeire S, Louis E, Carbonez A, Van Assche G, Noman M, Belaiche J . Demographic and clinical parameters influencing the short-term outcome of anti-tumor necrosis factor (infliximab) treatment in Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97(9):2357-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05991.x. View