» Articles » PMID: 36338721

Chromosome Instability in Neuroblastoma: A Pathway to Aggressive Disease

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Nov 7
PMID 36338721
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For over 100-years, genomic instability has been investigated as a central player in the pathogenesis of human cancer. Conceptually, genomic instability includes an array of alterations from small deletions/insertions to whole chromosome alterations, referred to as chromosome instability. Chromosome instability has a paradoxical impact in cancer. In most instances, the introduction of chromosome instability has a negative impact on cellular fitness whereas in cancer it is usually associated with a worse prognosis. One exception is the case of neuroblastoma, the most common solid tumor outside of the brain in children. Neuroblastoma tumors have two distinct patterns of genome instability: chromosome aneuploidy, which is associated with a better prognosis, or segmental chromosomal alterations, which is a potent negative prognostic factor. Through a computational screen, we found that low levels of the de- ubiquitinating enzyme have a highly significant negative impact on survival in neuroblastoma. At the molecular level, USP24 loss leads to destabilization of the microtubule assembly factor CRMP2 - producing mitotic errors and leading to chromosome missegregation and whole-chromosome aneuploidy. This apparent paradox may be reconciled through a model in which whole chromosome aneuploidy leads to the subsequent development of segmental chromosome alterations. Here we review the mechanisms behind chromosome instability and the evidence for the progressive development of segmental alterations from existing numerical aneuploidy in support of a multi-step model of neuroblastoma progression.

Citing Articles

Neuroblastoma Patients' Outcome and Chromosomal Instability.

Ognibene M, De Marco P, Amoroso L, Fragola M, Zara F, Parodi S Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(21).

PMID: 37958497 PMC: 10648898. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242115514.


Preclinical Models of Neuroblastoma-Current Status and Perspectives.

Krawczyk E, Kitlinska J Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(13).

PMID: 37444423 PMC: 10340830. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133314.

References
1.
Seeger R, Brodeur G, Sather H, Dalton A, Siegel S, Wong K . Association of multiple copies of the N-myc oncogene with rapid progression of neuroblastomas. N Engl J Med. 1985; 313(18):1111-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198510313131802. View

2.
Pezzolo A, Rossi E, Gimelli S, Parodi F, Negri F, Conte M . Presence of 1q gain and absence of 7p gain are new predictors of local or metastatic relapse in localized resectable neuroblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2008; 11(2):192-200. PMC: 2718991. DOI: 10.1215/15228517-2008-086. View

3.
Gisselsson D, Pettersson L, Hoglund M, Heidenblad M, Gorunova L, Wiegant J . Chromosomal breakage-fusion-bridge events cause genetic intratumor heterogeneity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(10):5357-62. PMC: 25833. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.090013497. View

4.
Maris J, Hogarty M, Bagatell R, Cohn S . Neuroblastoma. Lancet. 2007; 369(9579):2106-20. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60983-0. View

5.
Maris J, Matthay K . Molecular biology of neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17(7):2264-79. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.7.2264. View