» Articles » PMID: 36337493

Dichotic Spectral Integration Range for Consonant Recognition in Listeners with Normal Hearing

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2022 Nov 7
PMID 36337493
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dichotic spectral integration range, or DSIR, was measured for consonant recognition with normal-hearing listeners. DSIR is defined as a frequency range needed from 0 to 8,000 Hz band in one ear for consonant recognition when low-frequency information of the same consonant was presented to the opposite ear. DSIR was measured under the three signal processing conditions: (1) unprocessed, (2) target: intensified target spectro-temporal regions by 6 dB responsible for consonant recognition, and (3) target minus conflicting: intensified target regions minus spectro-temporal regions that increase confusion. Each consonant was low-pass filtered with a cutoff frequency of 250, 500, 750, and 1,000 Hz, and then was presented in the left ear or low-frequency (LF) ear. To create dichotic listening, the same consonant was simultaneously presented to the right ear or high-frequency (HF) ear. This was high-pass filtered with an initial cutoff frequency of 7,000 Hz, which was adjusted using an adaptive procedure to find the maximum high-pass cutoff for 99.99% correct consonant recognition. Mean DSIRs spanned from 3,198-8,000 Hz to 4,668-8,000 Hz (i.e., mid-to-high frequencies were unnecessary), depending on low-frequency information in the LF ear. DSIRs narrowed (i.e., required less frequency information) with increasing low-frequency information in the LF ear. However, the mean DSIRs were not significantly affected by the signal processing except at the low-pass cutoff frequency of 250 Hz. The individual consonant analyses revealed that /ta/, /da/, /sa/, and /za/ required the smallest DSIR, while /ka/, /ga/, /fa/, and /va/ required the largest DSIRs. DSIRs also narrowed with increasing low-frequency information for the two signal processing conditions except for 250 vs. 1,000 Hz under the target-conflicting condition. The results suggest that consonant recognition is possible with large amounts of spectral information missing if complementary spectral information is integrated across ears. DSIR is consonant-specific and relatively consistent, regardless of signal processing. The results will help determine the minimum spectral range needed in one ear for consonant recognition if limited low spectral information is available in the opposite ear.

Citing Articles

Frequency importance functions in simulated bimodal cochlear-implant users with spectral holes.

Yoon Y, Whitaker R, White N J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 155(6):3589-3599.

PMID: 38829154 PMC: 11151433. DOI: 10.1121/10.0026220.


Fusion of dichotic consonants in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listenersa).

Sathe N, Kain A, Reiss L J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 155(1):68-77.

PMID: 38174963 PMC: 10990566. DOI: 10.1121/10.0024245.

References
1.
Ronan D, Dix A, Shah P, Braida L . Integration across frequency bands for consonant identification. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004; 116(3):1749-62. DOI: 10.1121/1.1777858. View

2.
Fox R, Jacewicz E, Chang C . Auditory spectral integration in the perception of static vowels. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011; 54(6):1667-81. PMC: 4486011. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/09-0279). View

3.
Fowler J, Eggleston J, Reavis K, McMillan G, Reiss L . Effects of Removing Low-Frequency Electric Information on Speech Perception With Bimodal Hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015; 59(1):99-109. PMC: 4862739. DOI: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-15-0247. View

4.
Rasanen O, Laine U . Time-frequency integration characteristics of hearing are optimized for perception of speech-like acoustic patterns. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013; 134(1):407-19. DOI: 10.1121/1.4807499. View

5.
Viswanathan N, Magnuson J, Fowler C . Compensation for coarticulation: disentangling auditory and gestural theories of perception of coarticulatory effects in speech. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010; 36(4):1005-15. PMC: 3698240. DOI: 10.1037/a0018391. View