» Articles » PMID: 36333593

Accelerated Diffusion-Weighted MR Image Reconstruction Using Deep Neural Networks

Overview
Journal J Digit Imaging
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 Nov 5
PMID 36333593
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Under-sampling in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) decreases the scan time that helps to reduce off-resonance effects, geometric distortions, and susceptibility artifacts; however, it leads to under-sampling artifacts. In this paper, diffusion-weighted MR image (DWI-MR) reconstruction using deep learning (DWI U-Net) is proposed to recover artifact-free DW images from variable density highly under-sampled k-space data. Additionally, different optimizers, i.e., RMSProp, Adam, Adagrad, and Adadelta, have been investigated to choose the best optimizers for DWI U-Net. The reconstruction results are compared with the conventional Compressed Sensing (CS) reconstruction. The quality of the recovered images is assessed using mean artifact power (AP), mean root mean square error (RMSE), mean structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). The proposed method provides up to 61.1%, 60.0%, 30.4%, and 28.7% improvements in the mean AP value of the reconstructed images in our experiments with different optimizers, i.e., RMSProp, Adam, Adagrad, and Adadelta, respectively, as compared to the conventional CS at an acceleration factor of 6 (i.e., AF = 6). The results of DWI U-Net with the RMSProp, Adam, Adagrad, and Adadelta optimizers show 13.6%, 10.0%, 8.7%, and 8.74% improvements, respectively, in terms of mean SSIM with respect to the conventional CS at AF = 6. Also, the proposed technique shows 51.4%, 29.5%, 24.04%, and 18.0% improvements in terms of mean RMSE using the RMSProp, Adam, Adagrad, and Adadelta optimizers, respectively, with reference to the conventional CS at AF = 6. The results confirm that DWI U-Net performs better than the conventional CS reconstruction. Also, when comparing the different optimizers in DWI U-Net, RMSProp provides better results than the other optimizers.

Citing Articles

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging provides accurate staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, but is less preferred by patients.

Lambert L, Wagnerova M, Vodicka P, Benesova K, Zogala D, Trneny M World J Radiol. 2025; 17(1):99207.

PMID: 39876887 PMC: 11755907. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.99207.


Deep learning based apparent diffusion coefficient map generation from multi-parametric MR images for patients with diffuse gliomas.

Eidex Z, Safari M, Wynne J, Qiu R, Wang T, Hernandez D Med Phys. 2024; 52(2):847-855.

PMID: 39514841 PMC: 11788019. DOI: 10.1002/mp.17509.


Image quality of whole-body diffusion MR images comparing deep-learning accelerated and conventional sequences.

Ponsiglione A, McGuire W, Petralia G, Fennessy M, Benkert T, Ponsiglione A Eur Radiol. 2024; 34(12):7985-7993.

PMID: 38960946 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10883-5.


Boundary-Repairing Dual-Path Network for Retinal Layer Segmentation in OCT Image with Pigment Epithelial Detachment.

Liu X, Li X, Zhang Y, Wang M, Yao J, Tang J J Imaging Inform Med. 2024; 37(6):3101-3130.

PMID: 38740662 PMC: 11612104. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01093-y.


Pilot Lightweight Denoising Algorithm for Multiple Sclerosis on Spine MRI.

Mayfield J, Bailey K, Borkowski A, Viswanadhan N J Digit Imaging. 2023; 36(4):1877-1884.

PMID: 37069452 PMC: 10406747. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-023-00816-x.

References
1.
Mori S, Barker P . Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: its principle and applications. Anat Rec. 1999; 257(3):102-9. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19990615)257:3<102::AID-AR7>3.0.CO;2-6. View

2.
Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly J . Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007; 58(6):1182-95. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21391. View

3.
Elahi S, Kaleem M, Omer H . Compressively sampled MR image reconstruction using generalized thresholding iterative algorithm. J Magn Reson. 2017; 286:91-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.11.008. View

4.
Le Bihan D, Iima M . Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: What Water Tells Us about Biological Tissues. PLoS Biol. 2015; 13(7):e1002203. PMC: 4512706. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002203. View

5.
Ning L, Setsompop K, Michailovich O, Makris N, Westin C, Rathi Y . A Compressed-Sensing Approach for Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Diffusion MRI. Inf Process Med Imaging. 2015; 24:57-68. PMC: 4578654. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19992-4_5. View