Effectiveness of Glaucoma Screening and Factors Associated with Follow-up Adherence Among Glaucoma Suspects in a Safety-Net Teleretinal Screening Program

Purpose: To evaluate rates and risk factors associated with follow-up adherence to in-person glaucoma evaluations and confirmed glaucoma diagnosis in glaucoma suspects identified through teleretinal diabetic retinopathy screening (TDRS).

Design: Retrospective cohort study SUBJECTS: Patients with diabetes identified through teleretinal screening to have large or asymmetric cup-to-disc ratios in a Los Angeles County safety-net primary care-based TDRS program.

Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed to obtain demographic and clinical information for patients with cup-to-disc ratios concerning for glaucoma on TDRS. Patients who completed an in-person follow-up appointment within 1 year of teleretinal screening were adherent. Factors associated with follow-up adherence and diagnosis of glaucoma were analyzed with chi-square and independent t tests along with multivariable logistic regressions.

Main Outcome Measures: The proportion of patients with suspected glaucoma who adhered with in-person follow-up examination, proportion of patients with confirmed glaucoma diagnosis, and factors associated with follow-up adherence and glaucoma diagnosis.

Results: Eight-hundred seventeen patients with optic discs suspicious for glaucoma were included. Five-hundred thirty-four (65.4%) patients successfully completed an in-person glaucoma evaluation. Among these patients, 62.9% and 24.5% received a diagnosis of glaucoma suspect and glaucomatous optic neuropathy, respectively. Compared with patients aged < 50 years, patients aged 50 to 64 years had 1.57 times higher odds of being adherent with in-person visits (P = 0.036), whereas no difference was seen in those aged ≥ 65 years. For every $10 000 increase in the zip code median income, patients had 11% lower odds of being adherent (P = 0.031). Compared with Latino patients, Black patients had 3.52 times (P < 0.001) higher odds of having confirmed glaucoma.

Conclusion: The majority of patients referred as glaucoma suspects on TDRS completed a follow-up examination, and nearly a quarter of those examined received a confirmed glaucoma diagnosis. Patients aged ≥ 50 and < 65 years along with those from lower-income neighborhoods were more likely to follow up for an in-person evaluation. Compared with Latino patients, Black patients had a higher risk for a confirmed glaucoma diagnosis. This demonstrates the effectiveness of glaucoma detection in a large-scale TDRS program for a safety-net patient population.

Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.