» Articles » PMID: 36325086

Utilizing the Retrograde Flow of Internal Mammary Vessels As a Donor Pedicle

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2022 Nov 3
PMID 36325086
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

 The aim of this study is to assess the results of retrograde flow of internal mammary artery and vein (IMA/V) as a donor vessel for free flap microvascular anastomosis (MVA). This need arises with bipedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, when all four zones with extra fat need to be harvested for unilateral breast reconstruction coupled with poor midline crossover of circulation naturally or because of midline scar. Large anterolateral thigh flaps for chest wall cover, with multiple perforators from separate pedicles, also need supercharging. This needs an additional source of donor vessels, antegrade IMA/V being the first one.  Retrospective study of microvascular breast reconstruction using retrograde internal mammary donor vessels.  Out of 35 cases, 20 cases had distal IMA/V, with retrograde flow, as donor vessel for second set of arterial and venous anastomosis. In two cases, retrograde IMA/V was used for the solitary set of MVA. In remaining 13 cases, either retrograde IMA or V was utilized either as a principal or accessory donor. No flap was lost. Venous and arterial insufficiency happened in one case each, both were salvaged. Two cases developed partial necrosis, needing debridement and suturing. One case developed marginal necrosis. Only one case developed fat necrosis with superadded infection on follow-up.  Distal end of IMA and IMV on retrograde flow is safe for MVA as an additional or sole pedicle. It is convenient to use being in the same field. It enables preservation of other including thoracodorsal pedicle and latissimus dorsi flap for use in case of a complication or recurrence.

Citing Articles

Chimeric Free Flaps Based on End-to-Side Anastomosis for Complex Lower Extremity Reconstruction.

Gu Y, Sun Y, Xu K, Yi N, Qin J, Zhang Y Ann Plast Surg. 2024; 94(2):185-191.

PMID: 39729543 PMC: 11776879. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004180.

References
1.
Chan R, Przylecki W, Guo L, Caterson S . Case report. The use of both antegrade and retrograde internal mammary vessels in a folded, stacked deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap. Eplasty. 2010; 10:e32. PMC: 2864064. View

2.
Hassan S, Rasheed T, Raurell A . Salvage of a TRAM breast reconstruction flap using the retrograde internal mammary artery system. Indian J Plast Surg. 2015; 47(3):447-9. PMC: 4292131. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.146657. View

3.
Lee J, Varon D, Halvorson E . Unilateral Internal Mammary Recipient Vessels for Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017; 5(6):e1359. PMC: 5505835. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001359. View

4.
Goiti J, Smith G . Coronary artery surgery using inverted internal mammary artery. Br Heart J. 1982; 48(1):81-2. PMC: 481208. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.48.1.81. View

5.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View