» Articles » PMID: 36323751

Real World Clinical Feasibility of Direct-from-specimen Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Specimens with Unknown Microbial Load or Susceptibility

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Nov 3
PMID 36323751
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Within healthcare settings, physicians use antibiograms, which offer information on local susceptibility rates, as an aid in selecting empirical antibiotic therapy and avoiding the prescription of potentially ineffective drugs. While antibiograms display susceptibility and resistance data at hospital, city, or region-specific levels and ultimately enable the initiation of antibiogram-based empirical antibiotic treatment, AST reports at the individual patient level and guides treatments away from broad-spectrum antibiotics towards narrower-spectrum antibiotics or the removal of antibiotics entirely. Despite these advantages, AST traditionally requires a 48- to 72-h turn-around; this window of time can be critical for some antimicrobial therapeutic interventions. Herein, we present a direct-from-specimen AST to reduce the time between patient sampling and receipt of lab AST results. The biggest challenge of performing AST directly from unprocessed clinical specimens with an unknown microbial load is aligning the categorical susceptibility report with CLSI reference methods, which start from a fixed inoculum of 0.5 McFarland units prepared using colonies from a sub-culture. In this pilot clinical feasibility study using de-identified remnant specimens collected from MCW, we observed the high and low ends of microbial loads, demonstrating a final categorical agreement of 87.5% for ampicillin, 100% for ciprofloxacin, and 100% for sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim.

References
1.
Bubonja-Sonje M, Knezevic S, Abram M . Challenges to antimicrobial susceptibility testing of plant-derived polyphenolic compounds. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2021; 71(4):300-311. PMC: 7968511. DOI: 10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3396. View

2.
Ahuja A . The impact of artificial intelligence in medicine on the future role of the physician. PeerJ. 2019; 7:e7702. PMC: 6779111. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7702. View

3.
Kung A, Chen J, Tomasek M, Liu D, Rodgers W, Gau V . Transportation protocols for accurate assessment of microbial burden classification using molecular methods. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):16069. PMC: 8352943. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95619-x. View

4.
Schork N . Artificial Intelligence and Personalized Medicine. Cancer Treat Res. 2019; 178:265-283. PMC: 7580505. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-16391-4_11. View

5.
Choi J, Jeong H, Lee G, Han S, Han S, Jin B . Direct, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test from positive blood cultures based on microscopic imaging analysis. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):1148. PMC: 5430693. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-01278-2. View