Excimer Evolution Hampers Symmetry-broken Charge-separated States
Overview
Affiliations
Achieving long-lived symmetry-broken charge-separated states in chromophoric assemblies is quintessential for enhanced performance of artificial photosynthetic mimics. However, the occurrence of energy trap states hinders exciton and charge transport across photovoltaic devices, diminishing power conversion efficiency. Herein, we demonstrate unprecedented excimer formation in the relaxed excited-state geometry of bichromophoric systems impeding the lifetime of symmetry-broken charge-separated states. Core-annulated perylenediimide dimers (SC-SPDI and SC-NPDI) prefer a near-orthogonal arrangement in the ground state and a π-stacked foldamer structure in the excited state. The prospect of an excimer-like state in the foldameric arrangement of SC-SPDI and SC-NPDI has been rationalized by fragment-based excited state analysis and temperature-dependent photoluminescence measurements. Effective electronic coupling matrix elements in the Franck-Condon geometry of SC-SPDI and SC-NPDI facilitate solvation-assisted ultrafast symmetry-breaking charge-separation (SB-CS) in a high dielectric environment, in contrast to unrelaxed excimer formation (Ex*) in a low dielectric environment. Subsequently, the SB-CS state dissociates into an undesired relaxed excimer state (Ex) due to configuration mixing of a Frenkel exciton (FE) and charge-separated state in the foldamer structure, downgrading the efficacy of the charge-separated state. The decay rate constant of the FE to SB-CS ( ) in polar solvents is 8-17 fold faster than that of direct Ex* formation ( ) in non-polar solvent ( ≫ ), characterized by femtosecond transient absorption (fsTA) spectroscopy. The present investigation establishes the impact of detrimental excimer formation on the persistence of the SB-CS state in chromophoric dimers and offers the requisite of conformational rigidity as one of the potential design principles for developing advanced molecular photovoltaics.
Bressan G, Chambrier I, Cammidge A, Meech S J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces. 2025; 129(2):1069-1077.
PMID: 39839069 PMC: 11744789. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c07588.
Das B, Bhattacharyya A, Paul B, Natarajan R, Majumdar S RSC Adv. 2024; 14(45):33512-33523.
PMID: 39439828 PMC: 11495403. DOI: 10.1039/d4ra06436d.
Facilitating intrinsic delayed fluorescence of conjugated emitters by inter-chromophore interaction.
Gao Y, Sun Y, Guo Z, Yu G, Wang Y, Wan Y Chem Sci. 2024; .
PMID: 39430944 PMC: 11484929. DOI: 10.1039/d4sc05494f.
Sculpting photoproducts with DNA origami.
Gorman J, Hart S, John T, Castellanos M, Harris D, Parsons M Chem. 2024; 10(5):1553-1575.
PMID: 38827435 PMC: 11138899. DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2024.03.007.
Roy R, Chawla S, Sharma V, Pal A, Silori Y, Datta A Chem Sci. 2024; 15(17):6363-6377.
PMID: 38699268 PMC: 11062123. DOI: 10.1039/d3sc05325c.