» Articles » PMID: 36316119

A General Framework for Inferring Bayesian Ideal Observer Models from Psychophysical Data

Overview
Journal eNeuro
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Oct 31
PMID 36316119
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A central question in neuroscience is how sensory inputs are transformed into percepts. At this point, it is clear that this process is strongly influenced by prior knowledge of the sensory environment. Bayesian ideal observer models provide a useful link between data and theory that can help researchers evaluate how prior knowledge is represented and integrated with incoming sensory information. However, the statistical prior employed by a Bayesian observer cannot be measured directly, and must instead be inferred from behavioral measurements. Here, we review the general problem of inferring priors from psychophysical data, and the simple solution that follows from assuming a prior that is a Gaussian probability distribution. As our understanding of sensory processing advances, however, there is an increasing need for methods to flexibly recover the shape of Bayesian priors that are not well approximated by elementary functions. To address this issue, we describe a novel approach that applies to arbitrary prior shapes, which we parameterize using mixtures of Gaussian distributions. After incorporating a simple approximation, this method produces an analytical solution for psychophysical quantities that can be numerically optimized to recover the shapes of Bayesian priors. This approach offers advantages in flexibility, while still providing an analytical framework for many scenarios. We provide a MATLAB toolbox implementing key computations described herein.

Citing Articles

A unifying theory explains seemingly contradictory biases in perceptual estimation.

Hahn M, Wei X Nat Neurosci. 2024; 27(4):793-804.

PMID: 38360947 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-024-01574-x.

References
1.
Adams W, Graf E, Ernst M . Experience can change the 'light-from-above' prior. Nat Neurosci. 2004; 7(10):1057-8. DOI: 10.1038/nn1312. View

2.
Burge J, McCann B, Geisler W . Estimating 3D tilt from local image cues in natural scenes. J Vis. 2016; 16(13):2. PMC: 5066913. DOI: 10.1167/16.13.2. View

3.
Stocker A, Simoncelli E . Noise characteristics and prior expectations in human visual speed perception. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 9(4):578-85. DOI: 10.1038/nn1669. View

4.
Kwon O, Tadin D, Knill D . Unifying account of visual motion and position perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(26):8142-7. PMC: 4491751. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1500361112. View

5.
Simoncelli E, Olshausen B . Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001; 24:1193-216. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1193. View