» Articles » PMID: 36315482

Impact of Gender Mismatch on Corneal Graft Rejection and Rejection-related Graft Failure in Repeat Penetrating Keratoplasty

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Oct 31
PMID 36315482
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To explore the impact of gender mismatch on corneal allograft rejection and rejection-related graft failure in patients with repeat penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

Methods: A retrospective cohort was conducted at Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Patients with repeat PK and follow-up period of at least 6 months were recruited. Demographic data, pre-operative ocular findings and donor information were collected. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to gender mismatch between donor and recipient (male to female vs others). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The association between risk factors and the outcomes of graft rejection and rejection-related graft failure were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results: Of 68 patients with repeat PK, 26 patients (38.2%) were gender mismatched. There was no difference in 3-year rejection-free survival and graft survival between patients with gender mismatch and others (p = 0.698 and p = 0.402, respectively). Younger recipients (< 40 years) showed a significantly higher rejection rate compared to older recipients (hazard ratio; HR = 3.14, 95% confidence interval; CI 1.15 to 8.58), while patients with multiple PK (> 2 times) were found to be significantly associated with higher rejection-related graft failure compared to patients with 2 times or less PK (HR = 2.72, 95% CI 1.03 to 7.21). After multivariate analysis, only younger recipients demonstrated a statistical significance on graft rejection (adjusted HR = 2.86, 95% CI 1.04 to 7.84).

Conclusions: Gender mismatch might not impact corneal graft rejection or rejection-related graft failure in patients with repeat PK. Younger age was found to be a strong factor associated with graft rejection. Gender matching might not be compulsory for repeat PK.

References
1.
Gain P, Jullienne R, He Z, Aldossary M, Acquart S, Cognasse F . Global Survey of Corneal Transplantation and Eye Banking. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015; 134(2):167-73. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4776. View

2.
Di Zazzo A, Kheirkhah A, Abud T, Goyal S, Dana R . Management of high-risk corneal transplantation. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016; 62(6):816-827. PMC: 5479764. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2016.12.010. View

3.
. The collaborative corneal transplantation studies (CCTS). Effectiveness of histocompatibility matching in high-risk corneal transplantation. The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992; 110(10):1392-403. View

4.
Kharod-Dholakia B, Randleman J, Bromley J, Stulting R . Prevention and treatment of corneal graft rejection: current practice patterns of the Cornea Society (2011). Cornea. 2015; 34(6):609-14. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000403. View

5.
Stulting R, Lass J, Terry M, Benetz B, Cohen N, Ayala A . Factors Associated With Graft Rejection in the Cornea Preservation Time Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018; 196:197-207. PMC: 6258266. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.10.005. View