» Articles » PMID: 36312297

Antigenicity is Preserved with Fixative Solutions Used in Human Gross Anatomy: A Mice Brain Immunohistochemistry Study

Overview
Journal Front Neuroanat
Date 2022 Oct 31
PMID 36312297
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Histology remains the gold-standard to assess human brain biology, so studies using tissue from brain banks are standard practice in neuroscientific research. However, a larger number of specimens could be obtained from gross anatomy laboratories. These specimens are fixed with solutions appropriate for dissections, but whether they also preserve brain tissue antigenicity is unclear. Therefore, we perfused mice brains with solutions used for human body preservation to assess and compare the tissue quality and antigenicity of the main cell populations.

Materials And Methods: Twenty-eight C57BL/6J mice were perfused with 4% formaldehyde (FAS, = 9), salt-saturated solution (SSS, = 9), and alcohol solution (AS, = 10). The brains were cut into 40 μm sections for antigenicity analysis and were assessed by immunohistochemistry of four antigens: neuronal nuclei (NeuN), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP astrocytes), ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1-microglia), and myelin proteolipid protein (PLP). We compared the fixatives according to multiple variables: perfusion quality, ease of manipulation, tissue quality, immunohistochemistry quality, and antigenicity preservation.

Results: The perfusion quality was better using FAS and worse using AS. The manipulation was very poor in SSS brains. FAS- and AS-fixed brains showed higher tissue and immunohistochemistry quality than the SSS brains. All antigens were readily observed in every specimen, regardless of the fixative solution.

Conclusion: Solutions designed to preserve specimens for human gross anatomy dissections also preserve tissue antigenicity in different brain cells. This offers opportunities for the use of human brains fixed in gross anatomy laboratories to assess normal or pathological conditions.

Citing Articles

Comparison of histological procedures and antigenicity of human post-mortem brains fixed with solutions used in gross anatomy laboratories.

Frigon E, Gerin-Lajoie A, Dadar M, Boire D, Maranzano J Front Neuroanat. 2024; 18:1372953.

PMID: 38659652 PMC: 11039794. DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2024.1372953.


Ex situ perfusion fixation for brain banking: a technical report.

McKenzie A, Woodoff-Leith E, Dangoor D, Cervera A, Ressler H, Whitney K Free Neuropathol. 2023; 3.

PMID: 37284166 PMC: 10209847. DOI: 10.17879/freeneuropathology-2022-4368.


, perfusion protocol for human brain fixation compatible with microscopy, MRI techniques, and anatomical studies.

Insausti R, Insausti A, Lopez M, Medina Lorenzo I, Del Mar Arroyo-Jimenez M, Marcos Rabal M Front Neuroanat. 2023; 17:1149674.

PMID: 37034833 PMC: 10076536. DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2023.1149674.

References
1.
Raman M, Shu Y, Lesnick T, Jack C, Kantarci K . Regional T relaxation time constants in Ex vivo human brain: Longitudinal effects of formalin exposure. Magn Reson Med. 2016; 77(2):774-778. PMC: 5298016. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26140. View

2.
Troiano N, Ciovacco W, Kacena M . The Effects of Fixation and Dehydration on the Histological Quality of Undecalcified Murine Bone Specimens Embedded in Methylmethacrylate. J Histotechnol. 2010; 32(1):27-31. PMC: 2770706. DOI: 10.1179/his.2009.32.1.27. View

3.
Sun D, Jakobs T . Structural remodeling of astrocytes in the injured CNS. Neuroscientist. 2011; 18(6):567-88. PMC: 3713769. DOI: 10.1177/1073858411423441. View

4.
PUCHTLER H, Meloan S . On the chemistry of formaldehyde fixation and its effects on immunohistochemical reactions. Histochemistry. 1985; 82(3):201-4. DOI: 10.1007/BF00501395. View

5.
Brenner E . Human body preservation - old and new techniques. J Anat. 2014; 224(3):316-44. PMC: 3931544. DOI: 10.1111/joa.12160. View