Discrepancies in Patients' Medication Lists from Pharmacies in Sweden: an Interview Study Before the Implementation of the Swedish National Medication List

Overview

Journal Int J Clin Pharm

Publisher Springer

Specialties Pharmacology
Pharmacy

Date 2022 Oct 28

PMID 36307661

Authors

Tora Hammar

Leila Mzil

Birgit Eiermann

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Discrepancies in medication lists are common and can contribute to drug-related problems. This study was performed before the implementation of the National Medication List in Sweden, an intervention expected to improve the accuracy of medication lists.

Aim: The aim of the study was to examine the number and type of discrepancies in the medication list from pharmacies in Sweden. The secondary aim was to describe the information sources Swedish patients used as their medication lists and how confident they were with the information.

Method: Structured interviews were conducted with patients at 13 community pharmacies in Sweden during the period October 5, 2020, to April 16, 2021. The printed medication list was reviewed together with the patient to identify any discrepancies and missing information.

Results: A total of 327 patients were included in the study (response rate 51%). The printed medication list from pharmacies was the most common information source for patients to know which medications to use. Two thirds (n = 215) of the patients had at least one discrepancy among their prescriptions and 32% (n = 106) were missing at least one prescription medication. Among all prescriptions (n = 2567) 10% (n = 264) were non-current prescriptions, 9% (n = 238) were duplicates and 3% (n = 88) had the wrong dose. The proportion of prescriptions with discrepancies differed between drug-groups.

Conclusion: The discrepancies described in this study can have serious consequences, and results provide a baseline for studies after the implementation of the National Medication List.

Citing Articles

Value Propositions for Digital Shared Medication Plans to Boost Patient-Health Care Professional Partnerships: Co-Design Study.

Bugnon B, Bosisio F, Kaufmann A, Bonnabry P, Geissbuhler A, von Plessen C J Particip Med. 2025; 17:e50828.

PMID: 39874569 PMC: 11815291. DOI: 10.2196/50828.

Trends in Drug Duplications in Swedish Older Adults: A Nationwide Register Study from 2006 to 2021.

Erhan T, Wastesson J, Fastbom J Drugs Aging. 2024; 41(9):775-781.

PMID: 39269595 PMC: 11408397. DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01145-6.

Health professionals' experience and perceived obstacles with managing patients' medication information in Norway: cross-sectional survey.

Wang B, Manskow U BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):68.

PMID: 38218841 PMC: 10790274. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10485-9.

Potential Drug-Related Problems in Pediatric Patients-Describing the Use of a Clinical Decision Support System at Pharmacies in Sweden.

Abdulkadir S, Wettermark B, Hammar T Pharmacy (Basel). 2023; 11(1).

PMID: 36827673 PMC: 9967379. DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy11010035.

References

Rhalimi M, Rauss A, Housieaux E . Drug-related problems identified during geriatric medication review in the community pharmacy. Int J Clin Pharm. 2017; 40(1):109-118. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-017-0571-y. View

Salvi F, Marchetti A, DAngelo F, Boemi M, Lattanzio F, Cherubini A . Adverse drug events as a cause of hospitalization in older adults. Drug Saf. 2013; 35 Suppl 1:29-45. DOI: 10.1007/BF03319101. View

Jonsson A, Hakkarainen K, Spigset O, Druid H, Hiselius A, Hagg S . Preventable drug related mortality in a Swedish population. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009; 19(2):211-5. DOI: 10.1002/pds.1890. View

Jonsson A, Spigset O, Tjaderborn M, Druid H, Hagg S . Fatal drug poisonings in a Swedish general population. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2009; 9:7. PMC: 2679715. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6904-9-7. View

Hakkarainen K, Hedna K, Petzold M, Hagg S . Percentage of patients with preventable adverse drug reactions and preventability of adverse drug reactions--a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e33236. PMC: 3305295. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033236. View

Wilkes S, Zaal R, Abdulla A, Hunfeld N . A cost-benefit analysis of hospital-wide medication reviews: a period prevalence study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2021; 44(1):138-145. PMC: 8866269. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-021-01323-1. View

Kusch M, Haefeli W, Seidling H . How to meet patients' individual needs for drug information - a scoping review. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018; 12:2339-2355. PMC: 6229142. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S173651. View

Flink M, Ekstedt M . Planning for the Discharge, not for Patient Self-Management at Home - An Observational and Interview Study of Hospital Discharge. Int J Integr Care. 2018; 17(6):1. PMC: 5854016. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3003. View

Redmond P, Grimes T, McDonnell R, Boland F, Hughes C, Fahey T . Impact of medication reconciliation for improving transitions of care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 8:CD010791. PMC: 6513651. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010791.pub2. View

10.

Bulow C, Bech C, Faerch K, Traerup Andersen J, Armandi H, Treldal C . Discrepancies Between the Medication List in Electronic Prescribing Systems and Patients' Actual Use of Medicines. Sr Care Pharm. 2019; 34(5):317-324. View

11.

Ekedahl A, Brosius H, Jonsson J, Karlsson H, Yngvesson M . Discrepancies between the electronic medical record, the prescriptions in the Swedish national prescription repository and the current medication reported by patients. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011; 20(11):1177-83. DOI: 10.1002/pds.2226. View

12.

Caleres G, Modig S, Midlov P, Chalmers J, Bondesson A . Medication Discrepancies in Discharge Summaries and Associated Risk Factors for Elderly Patients with Many Drugs. Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2019; 7(1):53-62. PMC: 7060975. DOI: 10.1007/s40801-019-00176-5. View

13.

Modig S, Lenander C, Viberg N, Midlov P . Safer drug use in primary care - a pilot intervention study to identify improvement needs and make agreements for change in five Swedish primary care units. BMC Fam Pract. 2016; 17(1):140. PMC: 5050592. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-016-0542-8. View

14.

Gadallah A, McGinnis B, Nguyen B, Olson J . Assessing the impact of virtual medication history technicians on medication reconciliation discrepancies. Int J Clin Pharm. 2021; 43(5):1404-1411. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-021-01267-6. View

15.

van der Nat D, Taks M, Huiskes V, van den Bemt B, van Onzenoort H . Risk factors for clinically relevant deviations in patients' medication lists reported by patients in personal health records: a prospective cohort study in a hospital setting. Int J Clin Pharm. 2022; 44(2):539-547. PMC: 9007785. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-022-01376-w. View

16.

Hammar T, Ekedahl A, Petersson G . Implementation of a shared medication list: physicians' views on availability, accuracy and confidentiality. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014; 36(5):933-42. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-014-0012-0. View

17.

Linsky A, Simon S . Medication discrepancies in integrated electronic health records. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 22(2):103-9. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001301. View

18.

Mekonnen A, Abebe T, McLachlan A, Brien J . Impact of electronic medication reconciliation interventions on medication discrepancies at hospital transitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016; 16:112. PMC: 4994239. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-016-0353-9. View

19.

Bugnon B, Geissbuhler A, Bischoff T, Bonnabry P, von Plessen C . Improving Primary Care Medication Processes by Using Shared Electronic Medication Plans in Switzerland: Lessons Learned From a Participatory Action Research Study. JMIR Form Res. 2021; 5(1):e22319. PMC: 7819781. DOI: 10.2196/22319. View

20.

Waldron C, Cahill J, Cromie S, Delaney T, Kennelly S, Pevnick J . Personal Electronic Records of Medications (PERMs) for medication reconciliation at care transitions: a rapid realist review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021; 21(1):307. PMC: 8565006. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01659-8. View